CEO
Established
Country
Broker
Platform
Trust Pilot
Payment Methods
Payout Methods
Account Size |
Steps |
Challenge |
Price |
|---|
Atmosfunded comes off as a scam from my experience. I tried to withdraw **$900**, and they’re refusing it by claiming I “did copy trading.” That explanation doesn’t feel legit to me, especially since I followed their process and still expected to get paid.
Because of what happened, I’d strongly recommend that you stay away from Atmosfunded. There are too many red flags here, and at this point I just want justice. If you’ve been through something similar, please speak up—more people raising their voice could actually help.
I’m not able to rewrite this as-is because the text you shared looks like it’s been garbled (it includes lots of unusual characters and spacing), so I can’t clearly tell what the original review says or what points it’s making.
If you paste the review again in normal text (or tell me what it’s about and the key opinions you want kept), I’ll rewrite it in an authoritative, review-site style—natural and conversational, with varied sentence structure, minor realistic grammar slips, and the right overall length.
Estoy probando el desafío NOVA: ya lo pasé, así que ahora toca actualizar la cuenta y hacer el trading para esperar el cobro. Por el momento, todo bien y no me llevo quejas.
Con respecto a la interfaz y el soporte, la verdad es que es excelente. La plataforma se siente clara y el acompañamiento responde rápido. En general, la experiencia está bastante bien hasta ahora.
Absolutely—this is a platform you can trust. The experience feels solid and dependable from start to finish, and everything runs the way you’d expect without all the weird surprises. I’ve used it a few times now and it’s consistent, which honestly matters more than flashy promises. If you’re looking for something reliable, this one checks the boxes.
I just received my 2 payouts—thanks a lot! Everything’s been funded now, and it looks like the process is going smoothly on my end. Honestly, it’s a big relief to see it come through, especially after waiting a bit. Great stuff so far, and I’ll be watching how the next transactions go.
I’ve had a genuinely frustrating time trading with Atmos, and at this point it really feels like they’re manipulating their candles to force stop-outs. I’m not saying this lightly—my first trade with them had the same kind of problem: a candle printed in a way that looked clearly “moved,” and it stopped me out with more than 30 pips beyond where my stop loss should realistically have been triggered.
Then it happened again on the very next trade. Another candle formed at a level that was well outside the normal price action, and it clipped my position when I honestly should still have been in the trade. The company’s explanation is usually that it’s “just spread,” but in my experience, spread doesn’t consistently create candles that spike into stop levels like that. If spread is the issue, you’d still expect the price behavior to look roughly consistent across brokers—which it simply didn’t.
For reference, my account is 3025340. I traded EURGBP on April 29. My stop loss was set at 0.86592, and the candle that took me out was extremely abnormal. I went as far as checking the same move with multiple other brokers to confirm what the market was actually doing, and the issue only showed up on Atmos.
So yeah, from my side it comes across as shady, and I really think Atmos should be more transparent—especially since traders are the ones putting in real work, time, and risk management.
Mudah banget buat dapet akun funded, semoga kali ini beneran bisa tembus sampai payout. Aamiin.
Honestly, it’s been a horrible experience. I’ve never dealt with support staff this pathetic. If you’re looking to step into the kind of chaos you usually see in a crowded vegetable market, then by all means, join this firm.
The support team will very likely become the reason this company ends up going downhill. They’re rude, arrogant, and completely lack manners. For me, the real problem started right after I tried to get basic help. First, the person I spoke to didn’t seem to know how to organize an event at all. When I asked questions to understand what was going on, I was banned immediately—no explanation, nothing.
To top it off, it doesn’t feel like the Atmos Fund CEO takes the business seriously. From how things are handled, it comes across as totally unprofessional and unethical.
This is my personal experience, but I’d strongly advise traders not to waste their money here. Those “good ratings” and payout claims? In my view, they’re not real. Highly recommended for people to *avoid* this firm, not for anything else.
I managed to pass both phases, and I even posted my review. But it took them 4 days to get back to me, and when they finally did, they claimed I was gambling and doing grid trading. That honestly caught me off guard.
The main issue is that I used the same strategy in both Phase 1 and Phase 2. If that approach was acceptable during Phase 1, then it doesn’t make sense that they “breached” me in Phase 2 without a consistent reason.
After that, I tried reaching out for clarification, both through support requests and email. Unfortunately, I didn’t get any replies, which was really frustrating. In the end, I lost a lot of time, money, and a fair bit of my mental energy.
Working with this team has been a really positive experience overall. From the start, the rules felt clear and straightforward, and the whole process is surprisingly transparent. Things also move along smoothly—there aren’t any weird surprises, which I really appreciate.
On the payout side, everything has been dependable and on schedule. In my case, payments consistently came through within the expected window, and that kind of reliability does a lot to build trust long-term.
Customer support is another strong point. When I’ve had questions, responses were quick, and the answers were actually useful rather than generic.
Bottom line: this is a solid platform for traders who are serious about steady growth and staying consistent. I’d definitely recommend it.
I’ve been trading with Atmos for a while now, and honestly, the overall experience has been pretty positive. The evaluation process is fairly straightforward too—nothing overly complex or confusing, unlike some other prop firms I’ve tested.
What I also liked is how smooth the payout process has been on my end. Once I made sure I followed their rules properly, the withdrawal came through without dragging on, which is a huge deal if you’re trying to keep things moving.
That said, like any prop firm, you do have to stay disciplined and stick to their risk management requirements. If you can handle that side of things, then Atmos is definitely a solid option worth considering.
I joined the $5 Nova $10k challenge, and I actually passed it without much trouble. What surprised me most was how quickly I received my first payout—within about 48 hours. The whole process felt pretty smooth from start to finish, no weird delays or hassle.
Honestly, I’d recommend it to anyone looking for a straightforward challenge and fast turnaround.
Hello Atmos,
Thank you so much for getting back in touch with me. I really appreciate that, after about a week, you reinstated my account. My plan is to continue trading for another seven days, and hopefully at that point I’ll be eligible to withdraw my profits.
Honestly, my experience with the previous two accounts was pretty rough. I felt genuinely disappointed and it knocked my confidence a lot. So today, seeing this account restored has genuinely given me hope. It feels like I can still put in the work, stick with it, and finally earn a profit through you.
This isn’t my only account with Atmos, either. I do have several other accounts, and I’m even considering doing more in the future. That said, it will largely depend on how quickly I receive my profit share.
Thanks again, Atmos. You’re great!
Thank you!
I’m sharing my experience with Atmos Funded after purchasing multiple trading accounts, because honestly, the process didn’t end the way I expected.
In total, I paid £2,870 in account fees. During the period when I was trading, the firm reviewed my activity and I was able to receive payouts. To me, that was a clear sign my performance was accepted at the time and that nothing I did triggered any rule breach.
However, later on I was told I’m permanently ineligible to participate in their programs. What’s especially important is that Atmos explicitly confirmed the decision was risk-based—not the result of any rules being broken or any misconduct on my part.
After I was excluded from the platform, I requested a refund, since I can’t use the service I paid for anymore. Atmos did not offer a straightforward refund at all. Instead, they proposed a partial settlement of $846, but only on the condition that I sign a waiver. That waiver included confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses. They also told me they wouldn’t continue the conversation unless I removed my public reviews first.
I tried to handle things in a reasonable, amicable way, even offering to close things properly. But the company later withdrew their offer entirely and now says the decision is final. They’ve also stopped engaging further.
So to summarise the key points:
– £2,870 paid in account fees
– No rule breach identified
– Permanently excluded from the program
– Refund refused
– Settlement withdrawn and no further communication
I’ve kept full records of all correspondence, and I’ll now be taking this through formal dispute channels.
Based on what happened to me, I’d strongly recommend that anyone thinking about Atmos Funded understands upfront how disputes are handled and that their decisions may be applied in ways you might not expect.
I started with this firm in December last year, and so far I’ve received 6 payouts with them. Overall, the customer service has been genuinely helpful and super quick when it comes to solving issues—usually they respond fast and get things sorted without much hassle.
As for withdrawals, the payout speed has been solid. My last 5 payouts went through quickly, and the most recent one took about 48 hours before approval. Nothing too slow or frustrating, honestly.
I bought an “Atmos Instant Funded” $100K account (ID: 3018503) and managed to make $2,765 in profit. The payout seemed like it was going to go through fine at first, but right after the interview my withdrawal got cancelled. They blamed me, saying I didn’t trade the account myself—however, that doesn’t match what actually happened.
To be clear, I’m disciplined and qualified. I’ve been trading since 2022 with multiple prop firms, and this account was traded by me from start to finish. I understand compliance checks are part of the process, but the reason given just doesn’t feel accurate.
I’ll update this review once my payout is processed, because if everything is handled properly, my outcome should stand. For now, I’m pretty frustrated with how this was handled.
Atmosfunded has been a solid choice for me, and honestly, the experience has been pretty great from start to finish. What stood out the most is their customer support—every time I reached out, they were quick to respond and genuinely helpful. It made a difference, especially when I had questions and wanted clear answers without wasting time.
When it comes to withdrawals, the process is also smooth. In my case, profit withdrawals typically get handled within about 24 hours, sometimes even faster, which is a huge advantage if you like keeping things moving.
All in all, Atmosfunded feels like a reliable platform for traders. I’d definitely recommend it to others.
Absolutely excellent experience. From start to finish, everything felt smooth and well-organized, and the whole process was genuinely hassle-free. The level of service was top-notch—no runaround, just clear communication and quick follow-through. I’d happily recommend it to anyone looking for a reliable, stress-free experience.
Great customer service overall. I’ve had a smooth experience so far, and the team has been responsive every time. The only reason I’m not giving full marks just yet is that I’m currently waiting for my payouts to come through. Once that’s sorted, I’ll happily update this to a 5-star review.
Honestly, I’d call this UAE-based prop firm a very bad deal. I’m not just complaining for no reason—what they promise and what they enforce are two different things.
Here’s how it works, according to them. You start with a **Nova Challenge account for $5**. Once you pass the challenge, you’re supposed to get access to the funded account. After that, you pay the full amount of that funded account. Fine, but the real problem comes when you’re actually trading the funded account.
During the funded phase, if your trade hits **a 1% loss**, they immediately consider you in violation. And it’s not only about closing—if your position floats around **1% loss per symbol**, you can still be disqualified from a payout. On top of that, you’re not just waiting for payouts after one successful challenge. You must pass **another challenge inside the funded account** as well. That effectively means you’re looking at a minimum of **7 days**, and you need to hit a target of about **0.5%** of your account value.
So what happens in real life? For smaller traders, the payouts don’t seem reliable. After I finally got approved, they refused my **$600 payout**. The reason was basically that I had **a 1% loss per day per symbol** at some point, and they used that against me—even though I still reached my goals overall.
To be clear, these are the rules I was made to follow after getting the funded account:
1. **You must trade for at least 7 days** and take profit of around **0.5%** from your account value.
2. You **cannot hit 1% loss per symbol** (even floating loss counts).
3. The **maximum daily loss** is limited to about **4%**.
Look, I’m sure there are better prop firms out there than this one. So please—before you buy any funded account from this firm, double-check everything and read the fine print. Don’t just trust the marketing.
Good luck, guys.
This company seems to be doing really well. I requested a withdrawal, and once it was approved, I actually received the funds within the time limit they stated in my confirmation email. That clarity upfront helped a lot, and everything matched what they promised. Overall, I had a smooth experience with the process.
Mi nombre es Dilson Castillo. Soy colombiano y estoy realmente apasionado por el trading. Siempre he estado preparándome con disciplina para poder ser más responsable y, sobre todo, cumplir mis metas financieras.
En buena hora empecé con **Amo(s) Funded** (Amos funded) y la verdad es que estoy muy agradecido. Me tocó enfrentar varios desafíos durante las **pruebas de fondeo**—no fue fácil, pero justamente eso te obliga a mejorar, controlar emociones y enfocarte en lo que estás haciendo.
Y hoy, con mucha ilusión y gratitud, me encuentro operando **en real**. Gracias por esta oportunidad, Amos Funded. De corazón, estoy realmente agradecido.
I had a really disappointing experience with this funded trading firm. Once my account reached roughly $3,500 in profit, I started noticing some seriously odd behavior with the spreads. They didn’t stay consistent—at times they widened suddenly, and it was noticeable enough that it started ruining my entries and exits.
Because of that, I ended up taking around a $650 loss in a single day. It felt completely unjust, especially since the market itself didn’t seem to justify that kind of price movement. Then, shortly after the drawdown, my account was marked as “breached” because my equity dropped.
What made it worse is the timing. It honestly felt like the spread widening was being used to push trades in a bad direction, so the account would fail and the firm wouldn’t have to pay out the profits. Based on what happened to me, I’d strongly recommend others to stay away—or at least be extremely cautious before trusting them.
I tried the Nova Challenge and paid just $5 to kick things off, but only had to pay the full $79 if I successfully passed and earned the funded account. I’ve already received my funded account, and now I’m just waiting for my second payout.
If you read through the FAQ, you’ll see why I describe it as a transparent firm. Everything is laid out pretty clearly—no weird surprises.
What really impressed me, though, was the chat support. They replied to every question quickly and in a way that was easy to understand. Honestly, their responses felt as fast as actual trade execution. For example, I had questions about the risk protection rules inside the Nova Challenge. If you lose more than 1% (both equity and balance) on a single pair within a single day, it’s treated as a hard breach. But if you dip to around -2% at some point and then manage to recover back to -1% before the day ends, that isn’t considered a breach.
So far, I feel good about Atmos Funded, and I’m hoping I can keep generating consistent results and withdraw without issues. One last thing: I really hope they upgrade the dashboard and add a calendar view inside it. That way I can clearly track my winning and losing trading days directly in the platform, instead of relying on third-party apps.
They’ve got a ton of “hidden” rules, and it honestly feels like the goalposts move as soon as you manage to pass. If you fail the challenge, it’s whatever—no big deal, I get it. But the second you do pass, they suddenly cap you at a strict maximum 1% risk, then pile on several additional hidden conditions you didn’t see anywhere before.
On top of that, the spreads are surprisingly wide. Even worse, the slippage is basically the whole scam in a nutshell. In my case, my account got breached using the same kind of tactics: massive slippage right when it mattered most. I only had around $4 left to get through the challenge, but that slippage immediately pushed me into my daily loss limit and wiped me out completely.
To put it in plain terms, imagine you set a normal $300 stop loss. With their slippage, it doesn’t stop at $300. It can jump to something closer to $800 (or even more), and then you’re automatically in trouble before you can react.
I’ve rated this 4 stars for now, mainly because I haven’t received a payout yet. At the moment, I don’t really have any complaints about the service itself, but I can’t fairly give 5 stars until the funds actually hit my account.
I still have a few profitable days to go, so hopefully the payout will happen without any issues. That said, I’m noticing that some other traders are getting denied when they try to request payouts. From what I can see, it seems to be linked to a “max risk” rule on the Nova account, but it’s not very clear on their website. It’s frustrating because you’d expect those limits to be easy to find and understand before committing.
I’ll update this review once I’m able to request my payout. If everything works as it should, I’ll gladly revise my rating to 5 stars.
I didn’t originally plan on writing a review this detailed, but after everything that happened, staying quiet just didn’t feel right.
When I first signed up with Atmos Funded, I approached it like a normal opportunity—no drama, no pressure, and definitely no overthinking. I paid the fee, gained access to the account, and focused on trading. From the beginning, the platform felt neat and organized. There was nothing chaotic about it, and nothing in the early stages made me feel like I was stepping into a risky gray area. Overall, it read like one of those programs where, if you follow the rules and stay disciplined, things can actually work out.
So I did exactly that.
I didn’t overtrade. I avoided unnecessary risk, and I didn’t try to force the account to move faster than it needed to. Instead, I stuck to the visible guidelines, respected the limits, and took my time building the position. Week after week, the account stayed active and stable. Trades executed normally, and there were no alerts or warnings that suggested I was doing anything outside expectations. At least from my side, everything looked fine.
Eventually, I reached a point where the account showed meaningful profit—solid returns that came from consistency, not luck or random swings. Like most traders, that’s the stage you’re working toward. You do your part, follow the plan, and you reasonably assume the next step should be routine.
That’s when things started to unravel.
The second I submitted a payout request, the tone changed immediately. Suddenly, there was an issue tied to a rule that, as far as I can tell, wasn’t a factor during the entire trading period. There was no earlier notification, no restriction message, and nothing that hinted I was approaching a limit. It felt like the program waited until the end to introduce the reason the payout could not be processed.
And honestly, that’s hard to shake.
It’s a frustrating feeling when you go from believing everything is within bounds to realizing the reason your payout is blocked involves something you were never clearly told would matter at that moment. Even worse, once you’re at the payout stage, you can’t really go back and “fix” anything. The trades are already done. The work is already put in. You’re basically expected to accept a decision based on information that wasn’t made clear while you were actively trading.
I reached out to get proper clarification. I asked questions, requested details, and tried to understand the issue in a way that would help me connect the dots. But the responses didn’t really solve anything. They didn’t provide a clear step-by-step explanation showing what specifically went wrong and when. It felt more like they had already closed the case, and the customer support effort was mostly about confirming the decision rather than helping me understand it.
That experience is what sticks with me.
Not just the outcome itself, but how the situation unfolded. During the process, everything seems flexible and straightforward. Then at the end, it becomes rigid, and you’re left trying to interpret rule wording that was never clearly communicated as a concern. Trading was not the difficult part. If you’ve been trading for any length of time, you know how to manage risk, stay patient, and work toward consistency.
The real question is what happens after that—and whether the result of your effort actually makes it through the final checkpoint.
That’s where my experience didn’t match what I expected.
Time, focus, and discipline went into the account, and in the end, it didn’t translate into anything concrete—not because I was careless, not because I was gambling, and not because I was violating obvious guidelines. It was because of something that only seemed to matter at the final stage.
People may read this differently, and I understand that. Some users might have had a smoother process, and that’s totally possible. But if you’re considering joining Atmos Funded, one thing is worth keeping in mind: the work doesn’t truly end when you hit profit.
What matters just as much—maybe more—is how the payout decision is handled once you’re at that last step.
And that’s something you only really understand after going through it yourself.
Conditions look okay on the surface, but I’ve noticed something genuinely odd. For example, when I place a trade on GU (a buy), the spread shows around **0.6 pips** at entry. Then—once the trade is actually taken—the spread jumps to about **2–3 pips**. I saw the same thing yesterday on an **EU** trade as well.
Right now it’s sitting at roughly **4 pips**, and there hasn’t even been a major calendar event that would normally explain a sudden widening. In my case, that spread increase alone is enough to mess up the trade setup and potentially take me out before I even get a fair chance.
Overall, I’m just not seeing the consistency I’d expect, and it’s becoming hard to rely on entries when the spread changes after execution.
Quiero compartir mi experiencia con **Atmos Funded** porque, sinceramente, ha sido bastante positiva. En general, me esperaba un proceso más complicado, pero no fue así.
Desde el inicio, todo estuvo **bien explicado** y era fácil de seguir. Las reglas aparecen claras, con pasos concretos, y yo no tuve mayor problema para entender cómo avanzar dentro del challenge. También me gustó que la plataforma se siente **intuitiva y profesional**; no es de esas webs que te hacen perder tiempo, sino que realmente acompaña el proceso para operar con más comodidad.
Otro punto fuerte fue el **soporte al cliente**. Cuando tuve dudas, respondieron rápido (en cuestión de horas, por lo menos en mi caso) y con respuestas que sí servían, no con mensajes genéricos. Eso te da bastante confianza mientras vas cumpliendo objetivos. Además, la comunidad que tienen es bastante activa: se nota que hay gente dispuesta a compartir feedback y que eso ayuda un montón a seguir mejorando como trader.
En mi caso, el progreso salió sin inconvenientes y el proceso se sintió **transparente** de principio a fin. Se nota que están enfocados en apoyar a los traders y en ofrecer oportunidades que van más allá del típico “promesa”.
Así que sí: **recomiendo Atmos Funded** a cualquiera que esté buscando una prop firm seria para crecer en trading.
Atmos Funded — I managed to make about **$3,000** profit on a **$50K** account, yet I received **$0 payout**.
Here’s the timeline. I started with a **$5** attempt, but the firm grew that into a **$50,000** funded account. I paid **$345** upfront for the evaluation/funding. After that, I traded for the required window—**passed the challenge in roughly 2 hours** and then held trades for about **7 days** as instructed. During the trading period, everything looked normal: no alerts, no bans, no “you’re nearing limits” warnings.
So naturally, I expected a payout once the challenge was over. But at withdrawal, the response was basically this: a **“1% Risk Protection breach.”**
The part that really bothered me is that, according to their own email, this “breach” happened on **a single day only**. And the timing was suspicious too: the rule was **announced on March 30**, but I was flagged on **March 31**—literally the next day.
What seems to be the core issue is transparency. The **1% risk rule was not clearly shown in the challenge documentation**. It only appeared on a separate help page, and you had to go digging for it manually. Nothing during the challenge period made it obvious that the account had already violated anything.
To be clear on how their rule works: they define **1% risk** as your total risk **per symbol per day**, and it includes both **open and closed trades**. For a **$50,000** account, that means you’re effectively limited to **$500 per day** in total risk. And they consider **floating exposure and stop loss** as part of that calculation—not just the actual losses realized at the close.
Also, there was **no clear announcement** ahead of time, no warning during trading, and no indication on my dashboard that I was already over the limit. The problem only surfaced at the **payout stage**, which makes it feel less like a fair enforcement and more like a surprise rejection.
They did offer a “reset” option afterward, but that would wipe out the profits—which is kind of the opposite of what you’re trying to accomplish. On top of that, I later found **multiple other traders** reporting a similar denial for the same “1% Risk Protection breach.”
Bottom line: you can absolutely trade, follow the challenge rules, and even hit profit—**but withdrawal is where they can still shut you down**. Making money is one thing. Getting to keep it is the real test.
A minha experiência foi bem positiva, principalmente por ter apenas uma avaliação. Com isso, ficou tudo mais tranquilo e simples, sem aquele clima de comparação ou excesso de informações. No geral, foi um processo bem direto e leve.
I really liked the transparency this platform offers traders. It honestly makes the whole process feel more open and trustworthy, and I appreciate that a lot. Thanks for that—I’m currently waiting to get funded and hopefully everything goes smoothly from here.
Rafael Oliveira
Eu gostei bastante da plataforma no geral — a experiência é bem agradável e funciona de um jeito prático. Porém, tem dois pontos que realmente fazem falta. Primeiro, eu queria um dashboard mais organizado, com as informações melhor distribuídas e mais fáceis de encontrar. Segundo, um calendário de operações seria essencial pra mim; hoje eu sinto falta de visualizar tudo de forma mais clara, por dia e por período. Com esses ajustes, a plataforma ficaria bem mais completa.