CEO
Established
Country
Broker
Platform
Trust Pilot
Payment Methods
Payout Methods
Account Size |
Steps |
Challenge |
Price |
|---|
Got it—here’s what I can do:
– I’ll rewrite your review in a way that feels **transparent, honest, and genuinely written**, like it’s coming from a real person (not a template).
– I’ll **follow the rules you mentioned** (conversational tone, slight natural/real-world grammar slips, varied sentence structure, consistent capitalization, and word count within ~±20% of the original).
– I’ll keep the overall “authoritative review site” vibe—clear, direct, and useful—while still sounding human.
Please paste the review text you want rewritten (and ideally tell me the target word count if you have one). Once I have that, I’ll rewrite it accordingly.
I bought an instant funded account through Dominion Funding, and honestly, the experience didn’t feel properly explained from the start. I wasn’t asked to sign any contract, and there was no formal acknowledgment of their trading rules or enforcement process. That alone raised a red flag for me, because it feels like you’re being judged by rules you never specifically agreed to.
What happened next was even more frustrating. My account was breached after a single news trading violation—specifically, one trade that was opened about 6 minutes after a restricted news event. Now, I took the time to read through their entire published rules page in detail, and I couldn’t find anything that clearly states a first-time news violation leads to permanent termination.
When I challenged the decision with support, I didn’t get a real explanation. They just said the outcome was “final and fair,” but they didn’t direct me to any exact clause or written rule that would support permanent removal for a one-off mistake. It felt like a response designed to close the ticket rather than clarify the policy.
To me, the biggest issue isn’t even the violation itself—it’s the lack of transparency around what happens after the first breach and how severe the consequences can be. If you’re considering Dominion Funding, I’d strongly suggest you verify the termination conditions in writing before you purchase, because you may not get the clarity later.
## Payouts Have an Invisible Ceiling
At first, this company looks totally fine. They approved a couple of small withdrawal requests right away—smooth, fast, and with zero questions. So yeah, you naturally start assuming everything’s legit.
Then you go for a bigger payout and everything flips. My account was locked instantly. The reason they gave was incredibly vague: “inconsistent activity.” No breakdown of what supposedly triggered it, no evidence, and definitely no real opportunity to explain or fix anything. It was basically a copy‑paste email, then silence.
What really gets me is that the situation didn’t change at all. Same behavior, same activity—yet somehow I was suddenly “not a single user.” That wording alone felt weird, like they already had the decision made and were just dressing it up.
Support didn’t help either. There was no transparency, no accountability, and no meaningful answers—just more back-and-forth that went nowhere.
Honestly, if you’re trading with them, plan for this: there’s an invisible payout ceiling, and once you hit it, you might not get your money.
I’m going to keep posting reviews until I get a satisfactory response. My initial account was breached unlawfully, and while I was locked out, the platform kept my profit of **$1,728** instead of paying it out. After that, I opened a second account, and that one was breached too. This time the profit was **$4,432** (from **March 20 onward**).
What really concerns me is the lack of communication. There’s been no meaningful response, no clear explanation, and no updates—just silence, like they’ve disappeared overnight. It feels like they only follow through with payouts when it benefits their marketing, especially by paying influencers to bring in more customers. In my case, it genuinely feels like customers are the ones getting ripped off.
Overall, this is a big red flag for Dominion Funding, and I’m honestly shocked by how they handle issues like this.
**Payout Rejected**
Honestly, this was a pretty miserable experience. I’d already received **3 payouts** from this company without a hitch, and I used the exact same setup the whole time: the same device, the same internet connection, no VPN, nothing changed on my side.
Then, on my **4th payout**, it felt like it came out of nowhere. My account was suddenly flagged for “**IP issues**.” They said my account wasn’t consistent with a single user, which, in my situation, makes absolutely no sense.
What really annoyed me is the lack of transparency. They didn’t share any proof, no screenshots, no specific details, and no clear explanation of what was wrong. They also didn’t ask any follow-up questions or give me a chance to explain anything. Instead, I got a generic email and then—just like that—my account was blocked while I was still trying to get my payout processed.
And the timing really tells the story. Everything works perfectly at first, and then the moment you’re due for the next payout, they suddenly find a “reason.”
From my experience, I’d recommend being extremely careful. They seem happy to pay out small amounts—mostly to keep influencers and traders doing marketing—but once you’ve had a few successful payouts, they’ll likely reject you and shut you down without a real explanation. Be cautious, traders. This feels like a scam firm.
Let me be straight with you: you really need to read these rules carefully, because they’re not exactly flexible—and they can trip you up fast.
First, there are time limits on closing. For example, you can’t close a trade within the first **50 seconds**. If you’re used to quick scalps or fast exits, that alone will mess with your execution.
Second, position adding is heavily restricted. You can’t “add” to a trade if the current running position is **in loss**—not even by a tiny amount like **0.01 lot**. And it gets more strict than that: you can can’t stack **multiple trades on the same pair** (some rules mention limits like **up to 4 entries**, but the key thing is that you won’t be able to keep scaling like you normally would).
Hedging is also off the table. You can’t hedge a trade, no matter how you try to justify it. Plus, you have to remember there’s **slippage and latency**, which means the price you see and the price you get filled at may not match perfectly.
Then there’s the “candle” issue. Sometimes the platform will show candles that later look different or “move” after the fact—call it repainting, faking, or whatever name you want, but it’s something you’ll notice a lot after you purchase their account. It’s honestly one of those things that makes decision-making harder, especially if you rely on candle confirmations.
On the news side, you also don’t have freedom. You’re discouraged from checking major calendars like **ForexFactory** or **Myfxbook**, because this platform has its own “news” section. And apparently, even **low-impact news** can be treated as restricted or blocked for their accounts. The result? If you trade when you shouldn’t—even accidentally—you can end up with an account breach.
Overall, this is just my honest review: it feels like they don’t really want you to win. Once you buy their challenge, it’s almost like you’re already trapped in their system. And yeah, the naming and setups are everywhere—**Raja, AirRaja, Dominion Markets, Dominion Funding, Pipstone**, and a bunch of others—so it really gives the impression that the same family (or group) is running the whole “funded” business model.
⭐☆☆☆☆
Be very careful with this prop firm. Sure, the spreads and overall execution might look appealing at first, but the trading rules are painfully restrictive. In practice, they can trigger an account breach even if you’re trading in a fairly normal, sensible way.
In my case, the account was marked as failed due to something called a “Drawdown Position Management” rule. And honestly, it’s not as simple as it sounds. The rule heavily limits how you’re allowed to manage positions while you’re in drawdown. Even common tactics—like adding to a position to manage risk or improve average entry—can get you flagged quickly if your actions fall outside their specific conditions.
The bigger issue, though, is the lack of transparency and support. When I requested clarification and a review, I mostly got automated replies. There was no real, clear human review on their side, even though they state that accounts can be reassessed. In reality, it feels like it’s extremely hard to get a fair reconsideration once a breach is triggered.
So yes, you might trade well overall, but still end up blowing the account because the rule interpretation is strict—or just unclear.
If you’re thinking about joining, you really need to read every single detail of their rules and assumptions. Even small mistakes or misunderstandings can end up costing you everything.
Not recommended based on my experience.
I accidentally initiated a withdrawal of $50 when my account balance was $3,600. As soon as I realized the mistake, I contacted customer support to stop the payout.
Here’s the frustrating part: they told me they couldn’t cancel it because the amount was already showing as available. At the same time, their own website states that cancellations are possible if you contact them immediately, which makes this situation feel inconsistent.
Even worse, they processed the payout right away. I didn’t even get a chance for them to cancel it after I requested the stop, and the withdrawal was completed while I was still waiting for support to handle my request.
I passed Phase 1 and Phase 2 of a **$100,000 funded account** and ended up making **$15,000 in net profit**, all while following every single rule. On top of that, I also passed Phase 1 on a **$12,500 account**. Honestly, I don’t know what more they could’ve wanted—yet they still kept finding reasons not to pay.
So what was their excuse? They claimed my activity came from a **single IP address** that they say was linked to a **U.S. datacenter**. The issue is, I was traveling internationally at the time. I was on public networks, and I also used a friend’s mobile hotspot while I was in **Saudi Arabia**. For context, WhatsApp calls are banned there, and a lot of people rely on VPNs just to communicate. But here’s the important part: I had **zero VPN on my own device**.
I even provided proof. I submitted a **screen recording taken during my Umrah trip** showing what I was doing at the time.
I also sent them everything they asked for, and more:
– My **passport**
– **Boarding pass**
– **Hotel reservations**
– **Visa records**
– The **screen recording** again (so there was no confusion)
Then I went a step further. I joined their CEO’s **live stream**, spoke to him directly, and he personally said he would **forward my case**. Nothing happened after that.
In the end, about **1.5 months** of chasing and doing what they asked—completely wasted. **No payout.** They kept the **$15k**, despite the fact that they had all the context and documents.
They did refund my challenge fee, which is probably the only reason this doesn’t look even worse. But let’s be real: a refund doesn’t change the fact that I **earned $15k** and they still walked away with the profit.
If you’re a trader and you travel for **Umrah or even regular vacation**, you should take this seriously. With this kind of setup, **any network you touch abroad** can be used to deny your payout.
Bottom line: **don’t give Dominion Funding your money**. There are better firms that actually pay when you hit the requirements.
And I’m still profitable—nothing changes on my end. I’ll keep making more than that. This is about principle and honoring what they promise. Plus Raja said, **“trade from wherever you want”**, and that’s exactly why I traded while I was traveling.
So yeah—stay away from Dominion Funding. When you make enough to matter, they will look for ways to deny the payout. Most importantly: don’t trust any firm blindly, even if the CEO is on camera saying one thing while payouts are handled another way.
I recently finished the Dominion Funding challenge and got moved into the funded stage. Honestly, the rules are straightforward, the support team is responsive, and the entire process has been pretty smooth—way easier than some other prop firms I’ve tried over the last 8 years of trading.
So far, it genuinely feels legit. At this point, I’m mainly just waiting to see how the first payout goes, because that’s the real test. If it lands the same way everything else has, they could be a solid option for a lot of traders.
I had a genuinely good experience overall. I’ve now received my 4th payout, and everything has been pretty straightforward. The big thing is this: read the rules carefully and follow them exactly. If you do that, you should be able to get your payout without any drama.
I’ve tried a bunch of prop firms, but Dominion Funding is still the one I like the most. There aren’t any weird hidden rules, which is honestly rare. The dashboard is also really solid—clean, easy to navigate, and it includes useful info and a calendar that actually helps you stay on track.
On top of that, the support team has been incredibly good. Whenever I’ve had questions, they’ve responded quickly and were genuinely helpful. Overall, Dominion just feels more straightforward and professional than the rest.
I really don’t get the whole restriction where you can’t trade while the payout is being processed—usually around 48 hours. To me, that just doesn’t make any sense. If your account has funds available, why lock trading during that period? It’s frustrating and feels unnecessary, especially when you’re trying to stay active.
I had a funded account and I followed every rule they listed—both in the chat with the team and on their own violation board. As far as I can tell, I didn’t break any guidelines at all.
So I was honestly shocked when they refused my payout. The reason they gave was that after I closed a short position, I opened a long position with only a 1-minute difference. That’s it. No rule violation was ever clearly communicated to me in a way that made that specific timing issue obvious.
To be blunt, it feels like a scam. They don’t pay out, and they also keep “hidden” or unclear rules that—at least in my case—weren’t properly explained.
I also have screenshots showing what I asked them when I questioned those rules. If you’re considering them, I’d recommend being extra careful and double-checking anything related to order timing, because it could make the difference between getting paid or being rejected.
Received the payout.
There’s good, and there’s bad—and honestly, this company has more of the bad than you’d expect.
Let’s start with the targets. Their phases are lower than quite a few competitors in the industry: they use **8% for Phase 1** and **5% for Phase 2**. Many other firms typically set targets like **10% and 5%**, so on paper they look easier to reach.
The issue is that they operate with special rules, and they’ve added extra conditions with barely any notice. These seem designed to push you into breaching the challenge and then having you buy another. For example, they’ve introduced restrictions like **not adding an extra position while you’re in drawdown**, **no trades under 60 seconds**, and **limits on how many trades you can take in a day**. They’ve added all three.
Now, here’s the part that really doesn’t sit right: it’s not like these changes are clearly “bad” trading behavior on their own. They could be argued as high-risk practices, sure—but if the intent is genuinely to promote good risk management, then they shouldn’t penalize you in the strict way they do. Instead, you get “strikes” that escalate fast. From what I’ve seen, once you breach:
– **Strike 1** = you get a warning
– **Strike 2** = your payout split gets cut by **50%**
– **Strike 3** = your account becomes **ineligible for payouts**, which effectively forces you to buy another challenge
And the worst part? These trading-related rules aren’t clearly shown under the trading rules on the website. That lack of visibility is why I consider it poor practice from a company that claims to be fully transparent.
Support doesn’t help either. It’s probably the weakest in the industry. Replies take ages, and when they finally do respond, the tone is very robotic—no empathy, no real human understanding, just instructions that basically amount to “buy another challenge.” They *will* sometimes offer a **10% discount code**, which is nice in theory, but it’s hardly a lifeline when you can usually find better codes with a quick **30-second Google** search.
Overall, it’s not a great company, and I wouldn’t recommend it. Which is a shame, because I actually learned how to trade by watching **Raja’s livestreams**.
So far, everything’s been smooth. The trading conditions are genuinely strong, with low spreads and really fast trade execution. I haven’t run into any issues yet, and that responsiveness makes a big difference when you’re trading.
Honestly, I wouldn’t expect it to be like this. I’m using an instant model, and after trying it on my own account, I found that the spread doesn’t match what Mr. Raja shows on his IG.
In his posts, he mentions something like **1 pip at 0.8**—but on my end, the spread is at least **3 pips** when I open a position. And during the trade it moves fast too; I’ve seen it swing around **7 to 8 pips** fairly quickly. I get that trading can be challenging, but I still expected the numbers to be closer to what’s being advertised.
What really turned me off was what happened after I messaged him. I sent a message about what I noticed, and instead of replying with clarification, he blocked me on IG. It honestly felt like he doesn’t want to hear the truth. That’s on me as well—I shouldn’t have pushed further—but I will not be using this again.
I was asked to add more information, but at this point all I can say is: the spread is higher than what he shows in his videos, and the lack of any explanation (just a block) was extremely disappointing.
I had a pretty disappointing experience with Dominion Funding.
I had been trading successfully and keeping profits consistently across my accounts (IDs: 5002145 and 5002229). Everything was going fine, and then out of nowhere my accounts were suspended. There wasn’t any clear, detailed reason given. Even though I stuck to my risk management and followed their trading rules, the firm blocked access to my dashboard and refused to process payouts.
What really bothers me is the way the whole situation was handled. For starters, there’s essentially no transparency in how they make these decisions. I only received generic email replies, and they didn’t provide anything concrete—no specific evidence of violations, nothing I could actually verify. On top of that, there was no real chance to explain or defend my trades. The enforcement also felt extremely abrupt, with zero warning or proper escalation.
I kept following up after the suspension, but they wouldn’t reconsider or provide a meaningful explanation. They not only denied payout, they also didn’t offer any refund—nothing at all, even partially.
If you’re a trader, trust and clarity matter a lot. Unfortunately, this experience has left me with serious concerns about how Dominion Funding treats traders who are performing well.
Honestly, I’d strongly advise others to be very cautious before putting any money into this company.
I wanted to share my experience with Dominion Funding, and honestly, it’s been pretty positive overall. The service and support have been solid, and whenever I had questions, I got clear answers quickly. It felt genuinely helpful rather than rushed, which I really appreciate.
That said, I think it’s important to mention something that helped me a lot: traders should read the rules carefully and make sure they truly understand them before placing any trades. For my own learning process, I actually went through the rule set with ChatGPT, then revisited everything a few times until it all made sense. I also made sure the guidelines lined up with how I wanted to trade, not just what I *thought* they meant.
Earlier on, I had a couple of rule violations on previous accounts. But once I slowed down and took the time to understand the requirements properly, those mistakes disappeared. In my case, it was definitely on me—once I knew what the rules expected, I could adjust and stay compliant.
All in all, I’d call it a solid experience with good support. If you approach it the right way, you’ll likely have a smooth time.
I had two separate negative experiences with Dominion Funding, and both ended with my account being breached under circumstances that felt pretty questionable. Honestly, after what happened, it’s hard to trust the platform at all.
In the first case, I received warning emails and reached out to support to ask a basic question: was my account still valid? I was told clearly that my account remained active and that I could continue trading. I followed their guidance and completed the required trading days. Based on that reassurance, I genuinely believed I had qualified for a payout in the neighborhood of $1,500.
Then, during the payout review, I was informed that my account “should have” been breached earlier because of a system glitch on their side. That was incredibly frustrating, especially since my trading decisions were made based on the support messages I received. In other words, their own confirmation led me to act—and then they reversed it later due to something they say was broken in their systems.
To be fair, they did offer a new challenge after that incident, but that brings me to the second experience.
This time, my account was failed for holding a position over the weekend. After it happened, I went through their Help Center and Terms & Conditions looking for a clear, direct statement that weekend positions automatically trigger an immediate breach without any warning. I couldn’t find anything that spelled that out.
What makes it worse is that the day before this happened, I asked their chat support (the AI bot) what would occur if I tried to open a trade over the weekend. The response I got was:
“If you try to open a trade on the weekend on a instant account, it won’t be allowed.”
So from their own wording, the expectation was simple: the system would block the action.
Yet in practice, the platform allowed trades in a way that could instantly violate the rule and result in a direct account breach.
So basically, I’m left with two sides that don’t add up:
– The system allows the action
– Support suggests it won’t be possible
– The rules aren’t clear about the exact consequence
And then, despite all of that, the outcome is still an immediate account failure.
After two separate incidents—one tied to a supposed system glitch and the other involving unclear rule enforcement—I’ve lost confidence in Dominion Funding entirely. Overall, the whole experience felt inconsistent, a bit misleading, and not transparent enough from a trader’s perspective.
Hi everyone. I just completed a **7-day profitable run** and managed to scale up to a **$100k instant-funded account** at **10%**. Sounds great on paper, right? But the very next day, I received an email saying my account was **“breached.”**
Here’s the main issue: they claim they have **a lot of hidden rules**, and from what I experienced, those rules can get triggered even when you’re just trying to manage trades normally. For example, they apparently don’t allow you to open a **second trade**, and instead you’re limited to **only one layer** for execution/management. That constraint makes it really hard to adjust when the market moves, and it also feels like they’re setting traps with policies you don’t fully see upfront.
Honestly, this felt less like fair evaluation and more like a **scam operation**. So, please don’t waste your money or your time on them. Thanks!
This is honestly the worst experience I’ve ever had with a trading platform.
I’ve traded with several brokers and prop firms before, and I’ve never run into anything like this. Usually, the rules are at least clear enough to follow, and when you mess up, you know why. With this one, though, it feels like the guidelines are vague and enforced in a way that’s not really consistent or fair.
My account got rejected due to trade duration rules. The problem is that they don’t seem realistic for how trading actually works in the real world. On top of that, the requirements weren’t explained clearly or upfront in a way that a normal trader could realistically understand. It genuinely feels like the system is designed so that traders will end up failing over tiny technicalities rather than performance.
Because of what happened, I’ve lost all trust in this platform. I’m not going to use their services again, and I’ll definitely be warning other traders in my network to avoid signing up.
Before you register, I’d strongly suggest thinking twice. There are plenty of better, more transparent platforms out there.
Honestly, this is the worst firm I’ve ever dealt with. They refused my payout, and what made it worse is that it feels like they’re “breaching” accounts while acting tough behind the screens. The whole process has this full-on scam vibe, from start to finish.
And I’m not just talking online. I’m hearing Dubai is getting smashed too—basically, Raja and whatever scam dream he’s been chasing won’t last long. It’s honestly shocking how people can have kids and still manage to screw others over, especially when they’re not thinking that everyone else has families too.
I’d love to meet you and your support team in person, so we can talk face-to-face.
After about two hours working with your platform, I was hit with a breach of my account—no warning beforehand. By now, I understand your “services” pretty clearly.
On paper, your rules are supposed to protect both traders and your company. But in practice, it feels like those restrictions are built more to block traders from doing well than to create fair conditions where they can learn, adjust, and eventually perform. I’d also really like a straightforward explanation for one specific policy: why is it considered a safety measure to prevent a trader from closing a trade within 60 seconds? That doesn’t make sense to me when the issue is simply that the position was entered in the wrong direction (for example, buying instead of selling) and the trader is trying to cut losses quickly.
At first, I thought I was dealing with a trustworthy, supportive firm. Now that feeling is gone, honestly. Thank you for the experience—at least it let me keep my loss to around $100, and I won’t be buying any additional accounts with your company.
I hope this helps other traders make informed choices and protect their capital. Funding a company that operates like this is, in my view, one of the fastest ways to lose money.
Honestly, Dominion Funding was the first prop firm I ever tried. Before that, I had this pretty strong assumption that most prop firms don’t actually pay out—they just take your fee and then make excuses later. I know, it sounds cynical, but that’s what I believed.
Well… Dominion ended up proving me wrong. My first prop firm purchase turned into my first genuine payout, and that alone deserves recognition. I’m genuinely grateful.
Also, big shoutout to their team. They’ve been really supportive from start to finish, and they didn’t make it feel like you were just another ticket number. And just to be clear—this is not some paid review. I rarely write reviews at all, but they honestly earned the credit. That’s why I’m giving them a straight 5 stars.
One feature I especially liked was their Discord. Communication is way quicker there compared to waiting days on email responses. It’s just easier to get answers when you need them.
Thanks again to everyone at Dominion. And if you’re thinking about trying a prop firm, here’s the key: follow the rules, don’t try to game the system, and you should see real payouts.
This platform feels like it’s packed with hidden rules. Honestly, it reads like a total scam.
They terminated both of my funded accounts, and the reason they gave was “scalping.” What made it worse is that they were calling it scalping while the execution conditions were clearly not fair—wide spreads, fast slippage, and an overall environment that didn’t exactly support short-term trading. On top of that, the support team came off pretty amateur, and the payout restrictions were far more strict than what people typically expect going in.
In the end, it felt less like risk management and more like a way to shut people down and deny payouts. I wouldn’t recommend it.
❌❌❌❌❌
**Scam — avoid.**
From my experience, this platform feels like a setup. As soon as you deposit and get funded, they can breach your account. In other words, the “rules” seem to change in practice.
Also, the service quality is poor. My trades actually closed both above and below my stop-loss, and that resulted in a breach of my funded account. I didn’t think that was fair, and I figured support would at least review what happened.
When I finally contacted support, they didn’t help at all. Instead, they simply ignored me and **deleted my account**.
**Bottom line: do not purchase.** If you value your money and your access, steer clear.
There are just too many hidden rules with this service. Nobody clearly explains them upfront, and when I finally asked for a payout after successfully passing the account requirements, my withdrawal got rejected. I followed the steps, but I still didn’t get paid. Honestly, it’s not recommended at all—if you’re considering it, just be careful because the process feels unfair and unclear.
### Review Update (Payout Received, But Still Banned)
Quick update: I *did* finally receive my payout, and honestly, that was a huge relief. That said, I’m still banned from using their services.
I wouldn’t label this prop firm a total scam. Payouts do seem to be real, and the rules aren’t overly strict compared to some other firms. Still, the ban is a major issue for me. They said it’s due to their “third-party analysis” and the “risk factor” between both parties. In practice, it feels like you can do everything right and still get hit with a decision that you can’t really appeal.
So overall? Not the worst firm out there, but you definitely need to be careful with them. I won’t use them again, and I won’t recommend them to any friends either.
—
### What Happened
Everything was going well at first. I managed to make multiple payouts, including a total of around **$25,000**. Then, on my last payout request, things completely flipped.
I was denied the payout and then banned from their server shortly after. Before requesting the withdrawal, I had **no violations** or account flags. But then I received an email claiming my trading behavior broke rules that are “prohibited.”
The part that really doesn’t sit right with me is that my trading looked the same as it had on earlier payouts. Nothing materially changed, yet suddenly I got accused of things like:
– hedging
– HFT (high-frequency trading)
– copy trading
To be clear, I didn’t hedge any trades. There was no HFT on my side. And the only “copy trading” involved was from one of my accounts to another account of mine—which they confirmed should be allowed under their rules. That confirmation was also echoed to me via their Discord.
They also sent me a screenshot of what they called a “copy trading ring.” However, none of the accounts shown were mine, so I’m not sure why that was used to justify the ban.
At this point, it feels like a cop-out. They should refund the account and pay me what I earned, especially since I don’t believe I broke the rules. If they want to ban me after that, fine, but I don’t think I should be blocked from receiving my payout when I honestly didn’t do anything wrong.
This trading platform is pretty unreliable, and honestly, it feels like there are *way* too many rigid rules. That kind of pressure doesn’t just slow you down—it kind of drains your motivation to keep trading. By the time you’re trying to follow everything, you lose the momentum, and it becomes more frustrating than helpful.
Outstanding firm overall. The trading conditions are genuinely strong, and you can tell they take good care of their traders—so the whole experience feels smooth and well supported. Definitely one to consider if you want reliable execution and a decent environment to work in.
I’m sharing my experience with Dominion Funding because I think other traders should go in with their eyes wide open.
To start, I bought five challenge accounts. Unfortunately, I didn’t pass them, so I took the loss and paid the fees associated with those accounts. At that point, I wasn’t banned or flagged in any way.
After that, I purchased their Instant Model account. This one actually went in my favor. I managed to generate a profit of $3,715. So far so good—but things quickly turned ugly once I contacted support to get my KYC approved so I could withdraw.
Instead of approving my KYC, support told me I was suddenly banned from Dominion Funding. And that’s where my frustration comes from. If losing money on multiple accounts didn’t trigger a ban, then why was I banned the moment I became profitable and requested a payout? It just doesn’t feel right.
They did offer a refund, but only for the challenge fee. They refused to pay out the $3,715 profit I earned on the Instant Model account. In my opinion, this raises a big red flag. I can easily imagine other traders running into the same problem—getting stuck during KYC review or being rejected only after they’ve done everything correctly and made money.
If someone breaks the rules, I can understand enforcement. But if you follow the process and still don’t get paid, that’s not fair, and it doesn’t build trust.
I’m asking Dominion Funding to either release my payout or refund all fees I paid for the accounts—no partial refunds and no shifting decisions after the fact.
Bottom line: before buying an account from this firm, traders really should be careful.
While the execution is genuinely among the best in the industry, the whole experience feels a bit like a trap if you’re not extremely careful. They basically “micro-manage” your trading with a long list of rules and behaviors that *are* technically laid out in the terms and conditions you agree to—but in practice, they’re set up in a way that makes it easy to unintentionally slip up and lose your evaluation.
Some of the limits that can catch you off guard include things like **minimum trade duration** (for example, **60 seconds or more**, which doesn’t take much to accidentally break), **position stacking** (typically **no more than 2 positions** at a time), plus broader restrictions like **total positions limits** and other related constraints.
So if you’re planning to risk money for a funding challenge, I’d strongly suggest going with top-tier firms that impose as few behavioral restrictions as possible. At the end of the day, the main metric should be straightforward—**whether you respect the max loss limit**—not whether you happened to violate a bunch of very specific execution rules along the way.
If a firm needs to keep running promos nonstop—every single month—it already makes you wonder what they’re really trying to fix.
I joined their Discord for under a week, and right away I saw several people have their payouts denied for things that they claimed were allowed in the rules. On paper, they say that if you rack up **5 or more soft breaches**, payouts will be denied. Fine. Except that wasn’t what happened. Multiple traders with only **2–3 soft breaches** had payouts blocked anyway. When those people asked where the extra conditions were listed, the response was basically that it’s up to the **risk team’s discretion** to approve or deny—despite the fact that their published rules suggest something else.
There’s also the whole leaderboard situation. If you look at their **January leaderboard** (they may revise it after seeing this, who knows), they displayed a trader allegedly making around **$400,000** on a **$100,000** account. I was able to track down that trader’s Instagram, and they told me it was a **glitch**—that the real result was closer to **$8,000**. Even though Dominion later posted that payout on Instagram to pull people in, they quietly denied it behind the scenes.
And honestly, I don’t think that’s an isolated incident. I was on their leaderboard myself. I lost access to the account, but when I checked about a month later, I was still listed there as if nothing had changed. To me, that’s not just misleading—it’s outright untrustworthy.
Overall, the way they handle payouts and the inconsistencies with their leaderboard add up to a scam vibe. Just be really careful before you get involved.
If you’re looking for the best prop firm out there, this one honestly deserves the hype. From the moment you start, the platform feels smooth and well put together, and the rules are clear enough that you’re not left guessing what’s going on. The evaluation process also seems fair—no weird surprises, no “gotchas” that catch you off guard.
What really stands out is the overall experience: execution is solid, support is responsive, and the whole setup feels built for traders who actually want to focus on performance. In short, it’s one of the top prop firms in the game, and it’s easy to see why people recommend it.
My payout was rejected, and at the time I was honestly really disappointed and even a bit frustrated. I genuinely felt like I hadn’t broken any rules, but after thinking about it, I realized it was my mistake—I didn’t read all of their rules carefully before purchasing the challenge.
After that, I requested a review again. Shortly after, one of their team members contacted me and walked me through exactly what the rules were and where I had misunderstood something. They helped me sort it out, and once the issue was fixed, everything made sense.
Because of how they handled it, I have to say they earned my respect ♥️♥️. My advice to everyone is simple: please read every single rule before you trade or buy a challenge.
I just ran into a major problem with account number **107277**—my payout got **rejected**. Honestly, this felt less like a normal purchase and more like a setup, so I’m sharing what happened and what I found in the rules.
First off, you really need to read everything carefully before you buy. The **minimum hold time is 60 seconds**, and that rule seems to apply no matter what. Even if your **stop loss is basically about to hit**, you’re still required to wait at least **60 seconds** before closing the trade.
It gets even stricter with the timing. Even if a **1-minute candle moves 60 or 90 pips**, you still have to follow the **60-second rule**—meaning you must still wait the full minimum time before closing a **losing trade**.
Then there’s the trading limitation: you’re **not allowed to add to a trade**. And if you already have an open position that’s currently in **drawdown**, you can’t add another trade to it either. Break those rules and the account will be **breached**.
The biggest issue is that there are also a lot of **hidden trap rules** that are designed to catch you, even when you think you’re following everything properly. I purchased the account, followed what I believed were the basic constraints, and still ended up trapped.
If you’re thinking about buying, make sure you truly understand and accept **all** the rules first—because otherwise, you may end up in the same situation I did.
This was my first time trying Dominion, and I was honestly impressed. I hit the payout right away—within minutes—and it showed up instantly with a 1x payout over the next 24 hours. Everything felt smooth from start to finish, no delays or weird issues at all.
Dear viewers,
Dominion Funding really doesn’t pay the way they claim. I completed their challenge successfully, and I actually moved into the funded stage with their full set of rules in place. To be fair, their system is solid in one respect: they run daily audits, so if you breach any rule under their terms and conditions, you’re likely to get flagged.
Honestly, I didn’t run into any issues at first. I received my first payout without problems. Then I went for the second payout, and after the audit report showed no rule violations, I felt confident. But after that, things changed.
They sent me an email saying they hired a third-party auditing company, and the audit supposedly claims I did coordinated trading or copy trading from another platform to avoid payment. There’s a lot of “many people are complaining” energy around this, and at this point I can see why.
I asked them to do something simple: identify exactly what rule I violated and provide evidence of coordinated activity—whether that’s copy trading, hedging, or any kind of pattern they’re accusing me of. They never provided proof. They just pointed to a “history,” but nothing concrete showing how I supposedly violated anything.
For the record, I don’t trade with a team, and there’s no reason or evidence to support what they’re saying. If I’m wrong, they should be able to produce actual evidence. Period.
So my advice is: be careful with Dominion Funding. Try to protect the money you worked hard to earn rather than risking it with what seems like a scam-like situation. If they can prove wrongdoing, then fine—show the proof. Until then, I wouldn’t trust them.
Mehwish Waqar
**PAYOUT DENIED**
At first, they act like everything is fine. You might even receive a small payout to build trust. But once you’re consistent—usually after the **3rd or 4th** payout—things change quickly. They start coming up with weak excuses, and then they outright deny your payout.
What’s even worse is that **Dominian Funding** blocks you from accessing their website. There’s basically **no real support**, and you won’t get meaningful replies. From my personal experience, this firm feels like a scam.
I was banned after I requested my **4th payout**. Their reason was that my **IP address** was allegedly being used by multiple traders. That explanation was completely false, and it sounded like an excuse they use to stall and deny withdrawals.
Traders, please be careful. If you’re considering them, I’d strongly suggest staying away.