Customer Reviews (696)

• 

  María González

  1 month ago

  Llevo operando con ellos desde diciembre y, en general, todo bien hasta mi 4º payout. Cumpliendo con las reglas, me bajan el pago de 440 a 40, y claro… lo atribuyen a una supuesta Martingala.

  La explicación que me dan es que he aumentado el lotaje en varios trades para “recuperar” pérdidas. Pero lo cierto es que los lotajes siempre se han mantenido entre 2.5 y 5, según el stop que usaba (entre 5 y 10 pips). Además, los trades los hice en días distintos y en situaciones diferentes, no veo por dónde encaja lo de la Martingala.

  Entonces, ¿dónde está esa Martingala de la que hablan? Porque de momento la reducción me ha dejado bastante confundida.

• 

  Mehmet Kaya

  2 months ago

  Everything at the company seems good overall, but the spreads and the way the server behaves is just too obvious. For example, when price starts getting close to my SL, the spread suddenly widens, and then there’s also noticeable slippage. It’s hard not to feel like it’s being manipulated when the stop level is near.

  Another issue: the margin requirement for gold is way too high. Because of that, you simply can’t take normal risks like you would on other instruments—position sizing becomes very limited.

  I really hope this feedback is taken seriously.

• 

  Yasmine Benali

  2 months ago

  This is, without any doubt, the best prop firm I’ve come across. The platform is solid, the process felt pretty smooth, and everything is explained clearly. Honestly, I wish I’d started with them sooner.

• 

  Sofía Cardozo

  2 months ago

  Me parece una gran empresa, la verdad. En general todo está muy bien y se nota el crecimiento. Lo que sí deben mejorar son los retiros semanales, porque ahí es donde más se siente el detalle. Aun así, el servicio va bien y espero que sigan avanzando y mejorando cada vez más. ¡Sigan así!

• 

  سالم البلوشي

  2 months ago

  والله شركة محترمة جدا. إذا كنت متداول منضبط فعلًا تلاحظ إن السحب للارباح سريع جدًا، وما شاء الله عليهم. كمان السبريد على العملات صغير جدا مقارنة بغيرهم. بشكل عام تجربة مريحة ومرتّبة، وما فيها تعقيد.

• 

  Mariam Abdi

  2 months ago

  It’s a good company, believe me. You really won’t regret joining. Everything felt pretty straightforward from the start, and the team made it easy to get up to speed. I know some people worry about what to expect, but in my case it turned out great. Honestly, I’d join again without thinking twice.

• 

  Daniel Hussain

  2 months ago

  I did manage to make a profit of around £8k, so I was expecting a decent payout. In the end, though, my withdrawal got cut down to just £1k. Support basically blamed it on the usual “gambling reasons,” and of course there’s no free strategy allowed.

  The dashboard is still nice and simple, and honestly it looks pretty professional. But what’s the point if the payout is going to be reduced anyway? In my view, they’re paying out only about £1k–£2k just to show that withdrawals happen, and it feels like most payouts I see from other traders are in that same range. I can’t lie, that does look a bit suspicious.

  Slippage was also pretty rough. I ended up losing the risked amount— I had around £2k on the line and it turned into a £5k hit. There are definitely better firms out there.

  To be fair, my trading profits did cover my challenge fee, so it wasn’t a complete loss. Still, I wouldn’t use them again.

• 

  Nur Aiman

  2 months ago

  Honestly, I’d say these are among the best trading conditions I’ve seen, and the payout method is pretty smooth too. The rates feel fair, and withdrawals don’t take forever. Overall it’s a solid setup for anyone who wants reliable execution and an easy way to get paid.

• 

  Sy Amirul

  2 months ago

  Almost hassle-free overall. I did have a couple small hiccups, but the payout still came through on time, within the stated schedule. Really smooth experience considering—definitely better than I expected.

• 

  Lucy Harper

  2 months ago

  Finotive, your response still doesn’t address the traders’ frustration.

  You keep saying “qualitative assessment is required”, but that’s honestly the core of the problem. Traders are expected to follow rules that aren’t clearly defined in measurable terms. Then, after the outcome, payouts get adjusted based on interpretation.

  You mention things like “risk escalation”, “inconsistent exposure”, and “performance concentration”, but there are no numerical thresholds or clear boundaries. So how is a trader supposed to know in advance what will be considered compliant?

  Even if someone risks a fixed percentage per trade and sticks to a structured plan, they can still be cut down to a 10% payout based on subjective judgement. That doesn’t feel like a transparent, rule-based system—it feels discretionary.

  Also, pointing to payout proofs doesn’t really help. The real question isn’t whether a few traders are paid. It’s whether every trader can predictably meet the criteria for full payout before they place a trade.

  Right now, that’s just not possible.

  Until you publish clear, objective, and measurable standards, traders are left operating in uncertainty. It also looks like decisions are being made after results are known.

  That’s why you’re seeing repeated complaints, and why trust is being lost. I’m staying well away from this firm. My experience has been terrible, mainly because of the lack of transparency.

  In cases like this—where outcomes rely more on interpretation than clearly defined, measurable criteria—it’s reasonable that regulators would take an interest too, especially where transparency and fairness are involved.

• 

  Yousef Nasser Othman

  2 months ago

  Warning to any traders considering Finotive Funding: they appear to be systematically cutting profit splits down to just 10% the moment you start performing.

  In my case, it happened to two separate accounts—80118105 and 80117108—within only two weeks. And the reason they keep repeating is “Rapid Directional Flipping.” Problem is, some of the trades they pointed at were hours apart (one pair was roughly 5 hours apart), so it doesn’t really add up.

  I’m a scalper, so yes, my trading style stays consistent, but it feels like they only apply the stricter judgment when the payout would be over $1,000. That’s the part that really worries me. It looks like a tactic to avoid paying out successful traders.

  Honestly, don’t waste your time or money here if your plan is to make real profits. They’ll try to take around 90% of your earnings through vague rules, and it’s not straightforward to challenge. I’ve already filed formal disputes, and I’m taking this to Forex Peace Army as well.

• 

  Aamir Tan

  2 months ago

  Good company overall, and I really like that the terms and conditions are clear. No confusing wording, and everything was straightforward from the start. I’ve had a decent experience so far—nothing major to complain about.

• 

  Daniel Wright

  2 months ago

  Fraudulent prop firm!!! UK regulators really need to take action against these scammers. They come up with any random excuse to avoid paying, or they’ll try to reduce what you’re owed down to 10%. Honestly, it’s absolute rubbish—no integrity at all.

• 

  Amit Verma

  2 months ago

  If you don’t want to make the payout, then don’t. Simple. But don’t keep throwing out random, useless excuses.

  I can easily answer your points because I’ve taken these trades using a proper setup, not guesswork.

  1) Inconsistent Position Sizing

  I take trades based on a 4H break of structure. The position size changes only because the stop loss distance changes. For example, if the 4H candle is bigger, the SL becomes wider, so the position size reduces. If the candle is smaller, the SL is smaller, and the position size increases.

  So how is it “inconsistent” if the sizing is adjusted logically as per the setup? My risk is always 0.5% per trade, and I keep the position size accordingly. What exactly is the issue here?

  2) Inconsistent Trade Direction

  Let me be clear: my setup is the 4H break of structure. Sometimes I enter a buy trade, and if later the 4H break happens on the sell side, I close the buy and take the sell. That’s how the setup works. How can I “change” that? This isn’t random direction switching—it’s conditional on the 4H structure.

  3) Mixed Trade Duration / No Consistent Execution Model

  Again, the duration depends on market volatility and session flow. If the trade is triggered during the London session, it often takes longer to play out. If execution happens around the time the New York session starts, the move usually completes faster.

  So what is my mistake? The timing changes because the market conditions change.

  At the end of the day, you don’t have a real valid reason.

• 

  Youssef El Amrani

  2 months ago

  تعليق موجه للعرب تحديدًا.

  الشركة تسوّق لنفسها كأنها “ما عندها قواعد” ولا قيود… لكن من تجربتي العكس تمامًا. أنا أعتبر نفسي متداول ناجح، ومش بحكي عن نفسي إنّي خارق أو أي شي. الفكرة عندي بسيطة: كل أسبوع أطلب سحب لأن عندي خطة واضحة واستراتيجية سهلة جدًا، وإدارة المخاطر عندي لا تتجاوز 0.5%.

  بالقسم إنه لما يكون المبلغ كبير—مو شي خرافي، حوالي 600 إلى 700 دولار—يبدأ الرفض. يطلعون أعذار مثل إن أسلوبي “مقامرة”. الغريب؟ لما أطلب سحب أصغر مثل 200 أو 300 دولار، توافق مباشرة. وأنا هنا ما تغيّرت استراتيجّيتي إطلاقًا؛ استخدمت نفس الطريقة التي ربحت منها المبالغ الأكبر التي تم رفض دفعها.

  واللي يروّج لهذه الشركة على يوتيوب؟ بصراحة كثير منهم هم جزء من المشكلة—كلامهم غالبًا مضلل. أنا ما كذبت بكلمة وحدة، فخلي بالك… احذروا قبل ما تدخلوا.

• 

  Rashid Al Mansouri

  2 months ago

  ⚠️ Traders — I have a serious concern regarding Finotive Funding.

  I’m documenting repeated execution issues on my account (ID: 80109198). The biggest problem is the consistent negative slippage of roughly $2–3 on XAUUSD. And yeah, it wasn’t a one-off—this showed up again and again across multiple trades.

  What really bothers me is that it carried over into several positions and instruments, so it wasn’t isolated to just one entry. Over time, it directly affected my results.

  I submitted a detailed report to the risk team on April 3rd, including the full trade logs and specific position IDs. Then I followed up again on April 10th.

  As of today, there has been absolutely no response—no acknowledgment, nothing.

  The combination of execution discrepancies plus zero communication on a matter of this size is highly concerning.

  For context, this was on an account purchased for about $2,100. That makes me wonder how these situations are handled across different account tiers—if this is happening at this level, what happens on other ones?

  After reading other public feedback, it looks like similar concerns have been raised by more than one trader, which adds even more to my worry.

  I’m sharing this as transparently as I can, and I’ll keep documenting the timeline. I’ll update this post if and when they finally provide a proper response or a real resolution.

  ⚠️ تنبيه مهم للمتداولين بخصوص Finotive Funding

  أشارك تجربتي بعد ملاحظة خلل متكرر في تنفيذ الصفقات على حسابي (ID: 80109198)، ومن ضمنها انزلاق سعري سلبي مستمر تقريبًا بين 2 إلى 3 دولارات على XAUUSD عبر عدة صفقات.

  الواقع أن المشكلة لم تكن حالة واحدة فقط؛ بل تكررت عبر عدة مراكز وأدوات تداول، وكان لها تأثير واضح على الأداء.

  قمت بتقديم تقرير مفصل لفريق المخاطر بتاريخ 3 أبريل، مع إرفاق سجلات الصفقات كاملة ومعرّفات المراكز. بعد ذلك تابعت مرة ثانية بتاريخ 10 أبريل.

  وحتى الآن، لا يوجد أي رد أو حتى تأكيد استلام.

  الجمع بين اختلافات التنفيذ وغياب التواصل التام في موضوع بهذا الحجم يسبب قلقًا كبيرًا.

  وللتوضيح، هذه الحالة حدثت على حساب تم شراؤه بحوالي 2100 دولار، وهذا يطرح تساؤلات أوسع حول طريقة التعامل مع مثل هذه القضايا عبر مستويات الحسابات المختلفة.

  وبعد الاطلاع على ملاحظات متداولين آخرين بشكل علني، اتضح أن هناك شكاوى مشابهة من أكثر من شخص.

  أشارك ذلك بشفافية، وسأستمر في توثيق التطورات. سيتم تحديث المنشور فور تقديم رد مناسب أو حل فعلي.

• 

  Yuki Tanaka

  2 months ago

  Overall it was a really great experience from start to finish. I had to pass a few different challenges, then I got funded, and the payouts came through smoothly as well. The whole process feels quite straightforward, and honestly it’s pretty reliable day to day. For anyone who’s serious about trading, I’d say this is a solid option—no overcomplicated stuff.

• 

  Omar Al-Harbi

  2 months ago

  I had a pretty disappointing experience with this firm.

  In my case, the slippage went way beyond my set stop loss. For trade #40719849, my stop was placed at $18, but the position ended with a $48 loss after a market gap. Honestly, I expected some movement, but not that level of slip.

  Because of that last incident, I ended up losing my entire account. I’m not saying I didn’t make mistakes—I’m just saying I was trying to manage my risk properly.

  What really made things worse was how customer support handled it. I didn’t feel my case was reviewed fairly, and the reply felt more like a final decision than an attempt to actually resolve the problem.

  To add insult to injury, after I raised the issue, my account was restricted from purchasing additional accounts. That restriction felt unreasonable and unfair, especially given what happened.

  They offered $75 compensation, but it doesn’t come close to the real damage—especially considering I lost the whole account.

  Right now, I’m mainly looking for a fair solution: either restore my account or remove the purchasing restriction. If they can address this properly, I’d be open to updating my review. Otherwise, I’d advise other traders to be careful when dealing with this firm.

• 

  Dian Wicaksono

  2 months ago

  Proses payoutnya cepat, beneran nggak bikin lama. Harga yang ditawarkan juga cukup bagus—menurutku worth it. Pokoknya enak buat yang cari transaksi cepat.

• 

  Hassan Abdel Tawab

  2 months ago

  I’m writing to request an immediate manual review of Finotive Funding’s termination of my account. They closed my profile due to a “daily drawdown breach,” but the numbers simply don’t add up—especially considering my trade setup and the market liquidity at the time.

  Here are the technical facts, step by step:

  Safe buffer before the last trade: Before placing my final trade, I still had $46.29 left before reaching the daily drawdown limit.
  Trade details: I opened a 0.02 lot Gold position with a stop loss around $4,752. Even if the stop loss was hit, the projected loss would have been about $26 (so I would still have roughly $20.29 in safe equity above the breach threshold).
  Premature closure: Instead, the system closed my account at around $4,746 and the realized loss was only $14.06. That would still leave me with approximately $32.23 of safe equity remaining at the moment they shut everything down.
  Liquidity and spread concern: This occurred during the New York session, when liquidity is typically strong. There’s no reasonable explanation for any spread expansion or execution behavior that could suddenly erase a $32 margin on such a small 0.02 lot trade.
  Candle evidence: I also have TradingView proof showing the candle’s high/low near the closure time (18:47 Cairo time) was roughly 4,746 / 4,739. Even at the highest level, I remained within my risk limits.

  So at this point, I’m not asking for a “technical clarification.” I’m asking for my account to be reinstated or, at minimum, a full refund.
  Account ID: [80115990]

  UPDATE
  I’m adding another note because the company claims my request is “mathematically unfounded,” but again—the math is there, and I can show it.

  My daily limit was $216. At the time, I had already lost about $170, meaning the remaining buffer was around $46.
  My trade was 0.02 lots with a stop loss at 4752. Max loss on that position would be about $24, which still leaves about $22 of safe equity even in the worst-case stop-out scenario.
  Yet they terminated the account when the price was closer to 4746—about a $12–$14 loss range.
  In other words: I was still $30+ away from the daily limit when you closed my account. That doesn’t feel like a breach. It feels like an error (or worse) in how your system calculated/triggered the termination.

  I’ve uploaded the relevant numbers to Trustpilot as well. I don’t want a replacement account from a provider that can’t handle basic risk math correctly. I want a full refund of $25 now. If this isn’t resolved, I will proceed with a chargeback and also share the evidence publicly across trading communities on Telegram and Discord.

  UPDATE 2
  It looks like Finotive is trying to remove my review, but they can’t hide what their own dashboard shows. I’m including screenshots proving the account was closed with more than $30 of safe buffer still available.

  Mathematical proof:
  Starting daily buffer: $216
  Current loss: about $170, leaving roughly $46 buffer
  Trade risk: 0.02 lot with stop loss at 4752 (risk about $24)
  Expected remaining equity even with perfect stop-out: $22 ($46 – $24)
  Closure timing reality: the account was terminated when the trade was only down around $14

  Execution issue (or manipulation?): The screenshot of the 1-minute candle shows the closure happened during peak New York liquidity. There was no spread widening or slippage that could realistically consume $32 on a 0.02 lot position.

  Bottom line: I’m requesting a full $25 refund. I’m a verified customer, and I will not accept the idea that you can “miscalculate” my fees away through technical excuses.

• 

  Youssef El Marnissi

  2 months ago

  I’ve just finished my second payout with Finotive Funding, and I got my profits with no problems at all.

  That said, the whole process took a bit longer than I originally thought. My account was flagged for an enhanced KYC, and I was required to join a compliance call. Honestly, I was a little worried at first, but the team dealt with it in a professional way and kept things moving.

  During the video call, Compliance went through my trading approach, how I manage risk, and my trading history in good detail. Once they were satisfied with everything, they approved the payout and sent over the withdrawal certificate.

  As a trader, I actually like that they take security and trading behaviour seriously. It makes me feel like they’re not only protecting the firm, but also trying to filter out bad actors and keep it fair for real traders.

  Overall, my experience has been positive. I’ll likely continue trading with them and follow their rules and behavioural guidelines, because in the end it’s worth it.

• 

  Ricardo Martins

  2 months ago

  Let me put this clearly: STAY AWAY.

  From what I’ve seen, every single person I’ve spoken to ended up with their payout cut down to just 10%. I personally had a 100k account with a 1k payout, and it was reduced after what they called a “directional flip” following a loss.

  To be fair, the situation was like this: I opened a short for only about 10 seconds because I misclicked the direction. I closed it immediately afterward to open a long. Then they hit me with some vague clause—basically BS—claiming it “counts,” even though it doesn’t feel like a real, concrete rule. More like something they decide on the spot.

  Do not buy from them. In my opinion, they’re BY FAR the biggest scammers in the industry.

• 

  Ava Hart

  2 months ago

  Before you buy an account, you really need to understand how Section 7 and Section 8.3(f) work together, because the interaction is where most of the risk sits.

  Section 7 lays out behavioural expectations using phrases like:
  – “risk escalation”
  – “inconsistent exposure”
  – “performance concentration”
  – “non-standard execution”

  The problem is that none of these terms come with clearly defined numerical limits or measurable thresholds. There’s no solid guidance on things like:
  – how much the position size is allowed to vary
  – what profit concentration level is actually considered acceptable
  – what exposure counts as excessive

  So, in practice, traders are told to meet standards that aren’t objectively defined upfront. That alone can lead to frustration.

  Then Section 8.3(f) steps in and allows payouts to be adjusted based on the firm’s “reasonable belief” that those standards were breached.

  Meaning, in real terms:
  – you may not know in advance what exact behaviour will be treated as a violation
  – the assessment often depends on interpretation instead of fixed, quantifiable criteria
  – decisions can appear to be made after the outcome is already known, rather than against preset limits

  I’ve seen multiple recent trader reports suggesting payout reductions of around 10% (some people cite 8% or even 12% depending on the case). The recurring theme is that the explanations lean heavily on broad wording, not clearly defined thresholds. That leaves traders scrambling to figure out how to stay compliant—often with no reliable checklist.

  There are also reports that in Discord and Finotive, when payout reductions were discussed openly, some traders were silenced or muted for roughly 6–7 days after speaking frankly. Even if there are policy reasons, it understandably raises transparency concerns.

  For a framework like this to feel fair and predictable, it would need objective benchmarks—specific percentage caps, clear position-size variance rules, and measurable profit concentration limits are the obvious examples. Without that, it’s genuinely hard to consistently align actions with expectations.

  If the firm wants to address this, the main thing traders should look for is whether they provide clear, numerical, and verifiable criteria. If the explanations stay vague or interpretive, it usually indicates the system is driven more by subjective judgement than transparent rule-based standards.

  Anyone considering purchasing an account should read these sections carefully and understand how they’re applied in practice before committing. I won’t be buying another account again due to the hidden rules, the lack of transparency, misleading expectations, and the fact that discretion seems to outweigh structure—with post-event decisions rather than upfront limits.

  In similar scenarios, regulators may also take an interest in how firms operate when rules aren’t clearly measurable, especially when outcomes depend on interpretation instead of objective criteria.

  Please be careful, traders.

• 

  Laura Thompson

  2 months ago

  My English is completely fine at the moment. Honestly, based on how your team has been acting, even the language I used is mild. Do you really think I’m foolish for repeatedly messaging you and still not getting any reply?

  I had a trade issue, and your side promised compensation—said you would pay it. Since then, I’ve been chasing this for the past five to six days, asking for the compensation so I can restart trading. However, there has been absolutely no response.

  At this point, I’m not sure what I’m supposed to do next. My trading has been affected, and this is my first experience with your firm. I’m giving you a zero rating, especially the risk team.

  Eddie from Finotive Discord support—don’t tell me what to do. Your team at Finotive is full of scammers!

  -Talha Hussain

• 

  Hassan Ben Salem

  2 months ago

  C’est, franchement, l’expérience la plus bien financée que j’ai eue. Franchement, tout est très bien organisé et ça se voit dans les moyens mis en place. Rien à redire, c’est vraiment au-dessus du lot.

• 

  Minh Trần

  2 months ago

  Honestly, this company lacks transparency. I requested my $2,000 salary payment and got a confirmation email on April 1st saying the transfer was completed. But now it’s April 13th, and the funds still haven’t shown up in my Binance wallet. Each time I email them, they respond with another promise—same story, different day.

  Also, for “immediate” payments, there seems to be some unspoken rule that they only pay around 10% upfront. I don’t know how they calculate anything, but it definitely feels like I’m being kept waiting.

  In short: be very careful and don’t just trust their messages. On a positive note, I did receive a $2,000 bonus after working with them, so credit where it’s due. Thanks to Eddie for the support.

• 

  Nur Afiq

  3 months ago

  I’m genuinely happy with my journey at Finotive Funding. Overall, the whole process felt pretty smooth, and I also like how everything was explained clearly from start to finish. The team’s professionalism really stood out to me.

  One feature that I keep coming back to is the custom dashboard—it’s polished, looks sophisticated, and honestly it’s a pleasure to use. As for the funding opportunities, they’re impressive and the options available feel genuinely worth it.

  That said, if I could suggest one improvement, it would be about payouts. Right now, the setup is more like a Friday-only flow, and I think it would make a big difference if they considered daily payouts instead. Getting access to profits every day (or at least more frequently than once a week) would be a huge advantage for active traders, and it could really push Finotive Funding even higher in terms of being a top-tier prop firm.

• 

  Mai Nguyễn

  3 months ago

  Mình đã nộp khoảng yêu cầu rút lương 2.000 USD và được duyệt rồi, nhưng đến hiện tại tiền vẫn chưa về tài khoản của mình. Mình đã gửi email nhiều lần, gần như tuần nào cũng nhắc, thế mà phía họ chỉ trả lời kiểu “sẽ xử lý sớm” chứ không thấy động tĩnh gì. Thật sự mình hơi bực vì chờ khá lâu rồi.

  Ngoài ra, khi số dư tài khoản của mình còn khoảng 3.600 USD sau lần rút lương nói trên, họ lại thông báo rằng mình đã sử dụng chênh lệch giá. Điều này làm mình không hiểu, vì thường mình đi lệnh trong thời gian dài, nên mình mong họ giải thích rõ ràng cơ chế tính toán. Mình đã yêu cầu làm rõ nhưng cho tới nay vẫn chưa nhận được phản hồi nào, thành ra mình không biết nên tin theo thông tin nào nữa.

• 

  Carlos Andrade Díaz

  3 months ago

  La atención al cliente fue muy rápida y bastante eficiente. En todo momento me atendieron de forma clara y sin hacerme esperar mucho, y la verdad se nota que tienen buen manejo del proceso. Salí con mi duda resuelta en pocos minutos.

• 

  Oliver Harris

  3 months ago

  I’ve been trading with Finotive since 2021, and so far I’ve racked up close to $85k in total profits. Honestly, I’m living proof this company is legit, and they seem to keep fine-tuning their offering. The support is solid and it feels like they’re always trying to improve things. Just make sure you follow their rules properly—if you do, you should get paid.

• 

  Marco Bellini

  3 months ago

  Inventano regole per non pagare

  Esperienza davvero pessima con loro: il mio payout di 3,6k USD mi è stato tagliato con una divisione dei profitti del 10%, così mi sono ritrovato con 300 USD invece di quanto promesso (85% di profitto, che avrebbe significato circa 3.000 USD). La motivazione? Dichiarano di applicare regole “create” come “Profit Concentration” e “Directional Flip After Loss”, che però non risultano davvero nelle loro Termini e Condizioni.

  Ho provato a parlarci, gli ho spiegato la cosa, ma poi hanno smesso di rispondere. Onestamente: state alla larga, per me è una truffa.

  EDIT dopo la risposta dell’azienda, dove dicono che “fortemente non concordano” e che le regole non verrebbero inventate né applicate fuori dal loro framework documentato:

  Quello che mi hanno scritto è in realtà completamente diverso. Riporto qui alcuni pezzi copiati dalle loro email:

  “Profit concentration is evaluated within the broader framework of risk distribution and trading consistency. While specific percentage thresholds may not be explicitly listed as standalone rules, the generation of a substantial portion of total profit from a very limited number of trades is considered within the scope of concentration risk and structured execution assessment under Section 7.13.”

  “In questo modo, non viene applicata come una regola isolata, ma come parte della overall behavioural evaluation, come indicato nei Termini e Condizioni.”

  Le loro parole, in pratica, sono che “la regola” è talmente vaga e generica da permettere loro di costruire scuse per abbassare i payout. Se fossero un prop firm serio, indicarebbero regole specifiche e chiarissime su cosa devi fare (con criteri precisi). Invece con criteri “non esaustivi” e descrizioni ampie… possono coprire tutto, praticamente.

• 

  Sven Krüger

  3 months ago

  I had a pretty disappointing experience with Finotive Funding.

  I traded a $100K account using a conservative swing approach (max 0.05 lots). After that, I requested a payout of $2,616. The original agreement was a 75% split, but instead they cut my payout down to 10%, claiming “liquidity abuse.”

  To be honest, I don’t see how those trades justify it. The positions they flagged were held for about 4 to 13 hours—so it’s not scalping, and it doesn’t really look like execution abuse either.

  There were no high-frequency trades, no latency or spread arbitrage, and nothing like news-driven spike behavior.

  What really concerns me is the lack of transparency. They didn’t give a clear technical breakdown of what exactly triggered the decision, and it felt like only a handful of trades were used to overrule the overall behavior of the account.

  That makes the process feel neither fair nor consistent.

  I’d strongly recommend that traders be careful, read everything carefully, and make sure they fully understand the risks before working with this firm.

  Update:

  I’ve already contacted support and submitted all the required details, but the situation hasn’t been resolved.

  My biggest problem is how the rules were applied. In fact, most of the trades they referenced weren’t even executed within the 22:00–02:00 UTC window they mentioned.

  I’m still open to a fair and transparent reassessment, and I genuinely hope someone reviews the case properly.

• 

  Hassan Al-Waeli

  3 months ago

  I recently purchased an account from them, and honestly I’m dealing with a pretty frustrating slippage problem. Before I bought, a friend of mine who has a couple of accounts with the same provider told me they’re generally good and that payouts work, but the main thing they mentioned was slippage. At first I didn’t mind it much, okay maybe it happens sometimes, but then it started happening on almost every trade I took.

  And it’s not just a few pips. Sometimes the slippage is basically double the expected movement, which is honestly insane. Imagine you’re calculating your risk and following your trading plan, but you get surprised by totally different closing prices. That can ruin your risk management right away.

  To make it clearer, I opened a trade and set my SL at $10. The market moved against me and hit my stop, but when I checked again, my SL showed as $19.8. That’s almost double what I set. How is that even acceptable? It’s really depressing, because I actually planned to move up to a $100k account with them, but after seeing this I started hesitating.

  I have screenshots if anyone wants to see the details. Also, I sent a message on Discord about the issue and all they told me was to contact the risk team—like, is that really going to fix the problem? If they don’t sort out the slippage soon, I don’t think I’ll stay either. My friend ended up leaving them for the same reason.

• 

  Ahmed Hassan

  3 months ago

  They do allow copy trading between accounts, but this time they claimed that I manipulated exposure and performance by copying my trades across my accounts. In the end, they refused my payout of $3,616 and went ahead and terminated all 3 of my accounts.

  To be honest, they seem to interpret the rules however it benefits them—especially when it’s time to pay traders. Earlier, their agents told me that copy trading is allowed, so it’s very confusing that they later used the same activity as the reason to terminate me.

  Overall, I feel they mislead customers, and I wouldn’t trust any of them. Be careful before you deposit, because when it matters, the explanation changes.

• 

  Daniel Thompson

  3 months ago

  Incredible prop firm. I was genuinely blown away by what they offer. Honestly, it feels like the best out there across so many different factors. Their account setups and the rules are, in my opinion, some of the most reasonable in the industry, and I really hope they keep it this way for as long as possible.

  The Instant accounts are also a big win. The dashboard and website look really professional—clean, easy to read, and simple to use, which makes a difference when you’re trying to move fast. As for payouts, they’ve been the quickest I’ve seen so far. I was approved and the request was processing within about 2 hours, and the account was ready to trade again for the rest of the week.

  Other firms had me waiting up to around 3 days, and a few times they didn’t allow trading while I was waiting, so I missed out on some decent opportunities. So yeah, I really need Finotive to stay the same. I’ll definitely be grabbing more accounts if it continues like this.

• 

  Hassan Al Saidi

  3 months ago

  I had a pretty disappointing experience with this company.
  After I met all the payout requirements, my account was suddenly flagged for “liquidity abuse.” The payout then got cut down to just 10%, and honestly that feels completely unfair.
  To make it worse, I had already finished a full video verification call with their team. In that call, I explained my trading approach in detail, answered all their questions, and everything was marked as approved. No warnings, no concerns—nothing came up at the time.
  But the moment I became profitable and requested a payout, they changed their story. Suddenly they accused me of breaking rules that were never enforced, and that weren’t clearly restricted during the trading period.
  On top of that, my account is now in “close-only mode,” so I can’t trade normally anymore. That alone makes it seem like they lock people up once results look good.
  All of my trades were placed under standard market conditions on their platform. If certain trading hours or conditions aren’t allowed, they should block it in real time rather than penalizing traders after the fact.
  Overall, the way this was handled feels misleading and brings up serious concerns about transparency and fairness.
  At this point, I’m requesting either:
  – Full payout of what I earned, or
  – A full refund of the account purchase fee.
  I strongly suggest other traders stay cautious and think twice before dealing with this firm.

• 

  Rizky Sulaiman

  3 months ago

  Aturannya simpel, prosesnya cepat, dan pembayaran juga lancar. Kecepatan transaksi benar-benar kerasa—biasanya dalam waktu kurang dari 10 menit saya sudah selesai. Yang paling saya suka, profit-nya terasa stabil meskipun saya cuma mulai dari modal kecil dulu.Overall, propfirm-nya oke banget, nyaman dipakai dan nggak ribet.

• 

  Dmitry Sokolov

  3 months ago

  Сейчас работаю с Finotive Funding и могу сказать вполне уверенно: это один из лучших проп-брокеров, с которыми я сталкивался. Начинал с небольшого депозита — даже не думал, что так быстро захочу расширяться. Но условия реально подходят для роста, так что планы уже есть, буду масштабировать дальше.

  Самое сильное место — поддержка. Я несколько раз обращался с вопросами, и отвечают быстро, по делу, без лишней бюрократии. Чувствуется, что ребята действительно понимают трейдинг изнутри, а не просто “отрабатывают тикеты”.

  По исполнению тоже всё на уровне. Просадки из‑за проскальзывания почти не замечал — даже в периоды, когда рынок заметно штормит. Спреды комфортные, а это для моей стратегии, честно говоря, критично. По инструментам выбор хороший: торгую валютами, индексами и металлами, всё работает стабильно, без каких-то сюрпризов.

  Отдельно хочу отметить терминал и панель управления. Впечатление прям приятное — это одна из самых понятных платформ, которые мне попадались. Статистика по счёту, риски и прогресс отображаются прозрачно и обновляются почти в реальном времени, без задержек. Никаких “сферических коней в вакууме” — только понятные цифры и контроль.

  Ещё плюс в том, что компания постоянно развивается. Недавно узнал, что в ближайшее время появятся пластиковые карты. Для тех, кому важно быстро и удобно распоряжаться доходом, это будет реально следующий шаг.

  В итоге, я доволен тем, что начал сотрудничество с Finotive. Хочу строить здесь долгосрочную торговую карьеру. Если ищете надежную компанию для стабильной работы, рекомендую присмотреться к Finotive Funding. Тут слова про “честный проп” выглядят не как маркетинг, а как обещание, которое выполняют.

• 

  Anh Nguyen

  3 months ago

  Is this shameful company still scamming people up until now? If the answer is yes, then it’s really disappointing. Honestly, I feel like some people probably deserved it too—though they should’ve listened to the advice in the first place. I mean, if you don’t read the guidance, don’t act surprised.

• 

  Hassan Kareem

  3 months ago

  Honestly, this is a really amazing company. The rules are convenient, so traders can learn how to trade with less stress. Also, their prices are pretty symbolic—nothing feels overly complicated or overpriced. Overall, it’s a good place to start if you want to improve your trading skills.

• 

  Eulah Turcotte

  1 year ago

  Having traded with around ten different proprietary trading firms, I can confidently say that Finotive stands out as the finest option available.

  They offer the most competitive spreads, exceptional support, and top-notch services. Most importantly, their commitment to fairness and transparency is commendable; from day one, they reveal everything without holding back.

• 

  Christopher Schimmel

  1 year ago

  I’ve been trading with this firm for over six months now. Initially, I encountered some challenges due to the high level of risk I was taking.

  Thankfully, those issues are behind me. Currently, the payouts are consistent, and their policies regarding risk and trading instruments are laid out clearly—accessible right from your dashboard.

• 

  Aubrey Predovic

  1 year ago

  Customer service is pretty decent on Discord, but when you email them with issues related to your account, you might find that their response time is rather slow. It can be frustrating, as you often wait too long for a reply. Additionally, the firm’s rules seem inconsistent, with frequent changes that make it hard to keep up. Overall, there’s definitely room for improvement in their communication and policy stability.

• 

  Rosalia Fritsch

  1 year ago

  A trader’s paradise! With dependable payouts and narrow spreads, this firm truly delivers. Plus, the support team genuinely listens to your concerns. Honestly, what else could one desire?

• 

  Euna Gleason

  1 year ago

  I had a bit of a misunderstanding at first, but I was pleasantly surprised by the quick response from the support team. Oli from customer support managed to resolve two of my issues in just two hours. That’s some impressive service!

• 

  Lamont Weber

  1 year ago

  I strongly advise against investing in this firm.

  Initially, I bought two challenge accounts and successfully passed the first phase without any issues. I then moved on to the second phase and, again, passed it. However, I encountered a significant problem: they refused to grant me funded status and even reset my account, which was quite frustrating.

  After going through all of that, I managed to pass the second phase once more. But then I faced another setback. They denied my request for a refund on the challenge phase fee, despite their earlier promise that refunds would be processed on the 30th day. I accepted it, though, thinking it might be an isolated incident.

  Eventually, I achieved funded status, but then new rules came into play—specifically, concerning cash risk. My payout was reduced to just 10% due to cash risk, which had suddenly shifted to 3.5%. While I tried to stay calm about it, things only got worse.

  Just two weeks later, they adjusted the cash risk again, dropping it to 2.5%, even though my dashboard was indicating that a cash risk of only 1.25% should suffice. It left me bewildered and frustrated.

  When I purchased my account, the terms clearly stated a total drawdown of 10% and a daily drawdown of 5%, which meant I could risk a maximum of 5% each day. So why were they introducing these different and lower figures like 3.5%, 2.5%, and now 1.25%?

  In all honesty, I cannot recommend this firm. Value your hard-earned money and time by choosing a reputable proprietary trading firm instead.

Cancel reply

12345