Customer Reviews (2894)

• 

  Aarav Mehta

  1 month ago

  1★ — Their execution will cost you more than the challenge fee

  I’ve been trading gold across 5 prop firms for a while now. I know exactly what slippage feels like, but this is different. It’s not “normal market movement.”

  During the NY session, I saw sell orders start opening above the expected price, even though liquidity looked fine and there was no major news. The weird part is I flipped to another account the very same second—there it filled cleanly and perfectly. Every time.

  It’s not only the fills. Their order placement is seriously late. I’ve got 300 Mbps, I checked my connection and everything on my side, but it doesn’t matter. By the time Maven actually opens the trade, the moment is already gone.

  What really gets me is the 1% rule seems fully automated. There’s no real human review. Their own poor execution can push you past the limit and then the account is just closed. No appeal, no meaningful reconsideration.

  I do have videos and side-by-side screenshots showing what I’m talking about. This wasn’t happening on this exact same account before, so something definitely changed on their end. After that, their support went completely quiet.

  I don’t usually write reviews like this, but people should know before they put money into a challenge.

  At the end of the day, the house controls the spread, the house controls the rules—and when something goes wrong, it’s always your problem.

• 

  Emre Yılmaz

  2 months ago

  My daily loss limit is set to 2%, and for one position my risk is 1%. I took two identical positions while knowing exactly that the total would be around 2% (so basically the same as splitting the risk). Still, they closed my account when the combined result came to about -1% across the two positions. In my opinion, this is straight-up fraud.

• 

  Ahsan Rehman

  2 months ago

  Maven used to be really good a while back—the overall trading environment was strong then, and honestly it’s still pretty decent now. The issue is that their biggest flaw is the live support. Quite often, you message them and they simply don’t respond at all. Even when they do reply, the answers feel rushed and incomplete, so you end up not being satisfied. And to be frank, it sometimes feels like they just try to end the conversation rather than actually resolve the problem.

• 

  Hassan Ali

  2 months ago

  Maven didn’t pass my account even after I had been able to trade successfully for a full month. I was working on a 25k account, so I expected the evaluation to go through, but it never did. Later, once I finally passed, they told me to use a 0.01 lot size. On top of that, they gave me a new account specifically to continue with the same 0.01 lot size, for what felt like “until I breached.”

  Honestly, I ended up breaching that account due to frustration and the constant restrictions. Overall, this platform turned out to be a complete waste of time and money. I wouldn’t recommend it at all.

• 

  Yusuf Al-Harbi

  2 months ago

  After I finished the two-stage challenge, my account was suddenly closed and banned, and there was no clear reason given. I honestly followed the rules the whole time, so this felt unfair. Based on my experience, I can’t recommend this company—this is not the kind of behavior you expect from a trustworthy platform.

• 

  Amer Al Harbi

  2 months ago

  They banned me for absolutely no reason at all. When I appealed and asked what I did wrong, they just told me it was an internal decision. Honestly, I don’t really get it—there was no explanation, nothing, just a block.

• 

  Lukas Schneider

  2 months ago

  I would’ve given a higher rating, but honestly it’s not worth it… The red flags were there from the start.

  What happened:
  Maven shut down my $50k trading account after only a 4-day review. Their reason was “gap trading violations.”

  The trade:
  On April 29th, I placed the trade right after the FOMC news and the tech earnings report, around 00:01 CET at market open. I didn’t trade the gap itself—I used the first candle for momentum right after the announcement. My risk was kept under control, I let the positions run, and I hit my take profits successfully. From a performance standpoint, everything looked fine and I was technically passing my evaluation.

  The problem:
  I already had 2 successful payouts. Still, during the review, they suddenly flagged my activity as gap trading, with zero explanation or clarification of what exactly I supposedly did wrong.

  My advice:
  If you want clarity and fairness, don’t use Maven. I learned the hard way, and I don’t want others to repeat the same experience.

• 

  Daniel O’Connor

  2 months ago

  I bought five evaluation accounts through Maven Trading. In the end, one of them failed, two passed, and the remaining two were still in progress.

  The moment the two accounts passed, they asked for an interview straight away. After that, they terminated all four accounts, claiming there were “patterns consistent with non-discretionary or system-assisted activity.” When I followed up and asked which exact rule was allegedly breached and what concrete evidence they had, the replies stayed vague—mostly talking about the “structure and timing” of trades, not showing any real proof of automation.

  Maven only offered a refund on the two that passed. The other two were still running (and they said they’d cancel them), but they wouldn’t refund anything. Unsurprisingly, there was also no refund for the one that failed. Instead, they wanted me to sign a waiver saying I wouldn’t mention the experience in any reviews.

  Not recommended at all—feels pretty shady. I’ve also got a friend who went through the exact same thing, and the email wording was almost identical.

• 

  Ahsan Malik

  2 months ago

  In my experience, this is the best option for payout and support. I genuinely love it, because I’ve never once faced an issue when it came to withdrawing—every payout arrived on time, without any delay. The support team also seems responsive, so that’s a big plus.

  The only thing I don’t like is the “1% risk rule” per trade, especially when you go for a higher amount. If you risk more and then win, they still apply that rule after a payout. Honestly, that’s the only drawback I’ve noticed.

  I’m saying it’s the best for payouts because I once made $5k profit from a $10k account. When I requested a payout, the risk interview was pretty simple—nothing too complicated—and after that I received the withdrawal, which was amazing. Overall, I’m really grateful to Allah and I’ll keep using them.

• 

  Chinedu Okafor

  2 months ago

  I opened a trade with a 0.3 lot entry around 4733, and I placed my SL at 4775. Honestly, even a beginner should understand the math: if the stop-loss gets hit, the total loss should come to about -$1,260. To make it even easier to verify, I took the trade on April 21st. Anyone can check the gold chart—at around 15:03, gold was at 4733. After my entry, the highest price moved up to about 4740 before price eventually dropped and hit my TP at 4675.

  So, the floating loss on that order was only around -$210 (roughly 4733.00 to 4740.00). Yet somehow Maven’s “backend” claim says there was a floating loss of -$1,868. That kind of discrepancy is hard to swallow.

  And this is exactly the pattern that has been frustrating me since the day I reached my $5k withdrawal balance and got interviewed. After that, Maven kept using different excuses and tactics—first to avoid approving my live account, then to stall and not process my payouts properly. This prop firm has now reconfirmed for me what I suspected all along: it’s a scam. They only pay small amounts when they think you’re still manageable, but once you start talking big numbers, they find ways to fight you—by any means possible.

  Guys, please be warned.

  NB: They also offer traders “free accounts” just so you can go rate them on social media.

• 

  Abdul Rahman

  2 months ago

  Account number 10215175. I bought a two-stage account and I completed both tests with no risk, as they said. Still, the company later introduced a 1% loss limit on open trades, and honestly that feels unfair—especially because my account was a challenge account, not an instant one. Also, their evaluation rules don’t mention a 1% limit anywhere, so it came as a surprise.

  Even so, I stayed careful and still managed to make money. I used a 0.5% stop-loss order to be safe. The problem is what happened next: they closed one trade with a 1.5% loss, then closed my whole account and took away my estimated $1,500 profit.

  Because of this, I can’t recommend the company. There are better options out there, and based on my experience this one doesn’t feel trustworthy.

• 

  Basim Saad

  2 months ago

  Account Number: 10268203. I went through the two-step process, and honestly everything looked fine at first. All of my trades ended up profitable, and I made sure to close every position within about 30 minutes of opening it. However, despite that, the company suddenly closed my account without giving me any explanation.

  I really don’t recommend dealing with this company. In my opinion, there are plenty of better and more reliable options out there that won’t make decisions like this without at least some clarification.

• 

  Daniel Brooks

  2 months ago

  I’ve been with Maven for roughly 7 months now, and I’ve just received my payout—honestly, that was a big milestone for me.

  It wasn’t all smooth sailing at the start though. I had to stay disciplined and keep things consistent, and that’s really what made the difference in the end.

  The support team was genuinely helpful, and once everything was verified, the payout process moved along pretty smoothly. There were no weird delays on my side.

  Overall, in my experience, Maven feels legit. But of course, it’s still a prop firm, so you’ve got to stick to the rules and manage risk properly—otherwise you’re going to run into trouble.

  So far I’m happy with how it’s gone, and I’m aiming for more steady, consistent payouts from here.

• 

  Amitesh Nair

  2 months ago

  This is honestly the worst experience I’ve had with any funded account. They didn’t pay me anything, not even a partial payout. I completed the challenge account, passed the required steps, and still the account was never provided to me.

  It’s really frustrating because the whole process felt like it was leading somewhere, but in the end nothing happened. I wouldn’t recommend them at all.

• 

  Amit Singh

  2 months ago

  The spreads are extremely high. Because of that, your limit orders don’t always trigger immediately—if price hovers around your chosen level, it might trigger briefly or it may just keep bouncing and not fill at all. The same frustrating behavior happens with TP and SL too. In many cases, price will hover near those levels but the order won’t execute until you close the position manually.

  Honestly, I wouldn’t recommend going for “slightly lower prices” with a setup like this. If you’re looking for a prop firm, choose one that actually offers low spreads and more reliable order execution.

  Another big issue: they don’t have live support. I had a losing position on 22nd April 2026, so I closed the platform and handled it from my side. The next day, when I tried to place a trade, it showed “daily drawdown breached.” I then checked the previous day’s trades, and it listed 3 positions in loss that I hadn’t placed or traded at all.

  What’s even more concerning is that those 3 trades show up with the exact same timestamps, the exact same entry prices, and the exits at the same prices too. I still can’t understand how those trades appeared in my account, and of course they contributed to my drawdown being breached.

  Overall, the execution/spread issues are bad enough, but the lack of live support makes it worse. I’d really like someone from their team to explain how those unauthorized trades were added and why I was penalized for it.

• 

  Rohit Sharma

  2 months ago

  Please don’t use the Meven funding plan. In my case, his trading terminal was really slow on Meta 5, and the trade execution took way too long. Because of that delay, I couldn’t get my TPs either—none of the targets were hit during my trades. I personally tried running it multiple times, but the performance stayed poor.

  Overall, this has been a very bad experience with Meven trading for me.

• 

  Mekdes Abebe

  2 months ago

  Honestly, I don’t like it at all—so please don’t waste your time or money. The experience was disappointing from the start, and I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone, even if it’s on sale. Save your budget for something better.

• 

  Luciano Pérez

  2 months ago

  La empresa muestra un desplazamiento de casi 1,8 pips. El tema es que cuando querés cerrar a mercado, hay un delay bastante notable. Y si intentás cerrar con una orden limit, directamente no respeta tu precio: te “pasa” por el nivel y cierra recién cuando hay un retroceso, o incluso algunos pips por encima. En la práctica, esto termina siendo frustrante, sobre todo cuando el precio se mueve rápido.

• 

  Omar El-Din

  2 months ago

  They closed my account while I was in profit. The reason they gave was that I “lost from equity,” but that didn’t make sense because I was clearly up. Maybe it was just a retracement, but still—how am I supposed to stop “losing” when I’m actually in profit? I was trying to build bigger returns, not throw the trade away. Overall, Maven’s one of the worst prop-funded programs I’ve bought into.

• 

  Hanna Mekonnen

  2 months ago

  Honestly, this was way too much sleep for me. I ended up feeling groggy and a bit off, like it was closer to sleeping 2 hours longer than I needed. If you’re someone who prefers a lighter rest, you might wanna think twice.

• 

  Faruk Hasan

  3 months ago

  I had a pretty disappointing experience with Maven Trading, especially with how they handled my account review.

  My account was flagged for “group trading” using a device identifier (CID). I explained thoroughly that I’m running a ForexVPS setup, which is a pretty common arrangement for traders, and I even shared the full VPS details to back it up.

  I understand that in virtualized environments, device identifiers can sometimes overlap because the infrastructure is shared. Still, even after I clarified everything and asked for a proper reassessment, I wasn’t shown any trading-based evidence—nothing like:

  – trade correlation
  – mirrored positions
  – or coordinated execution

  I sent several professional emails and follow-ups (over 3–4 attempts), but now I’m not getting any replies at all. There’s been no clear resolution, which is honestly frustrating.

  I respect that prop firms need to enforce their rules, of course, but the decision should be transparent, consistent, and supported with clear proof. In my case, relying only on a device identifier—without any trading activity breakdown—really raises concerns.

  I’m still willing to resolve this in a professional way, and I’d appreciate a proper review based on actual trading behavior. Until that happens, I can’t recommend this firm based on what I experienced.

• 

  Chloe Williams

  3 months ago

  I’m a 17-year-old student, and trading has been basically my whole life for the past 4 years. Since I was 13, I’ve spent every single day practicing on demo accounts, staring at charts for 12+ hours straight—until my eyes were basically burning. I did all of that with one goal: to actually change my family’s situation.

  After saving every penny, I finally bought a $2,000 challenge (Order #1053923). Because I’m 17, I opened the account legally in my mother’s name. I worked incredibly hard and successfully passed Phase 1. Maven even emailed her a Certificate of Achievement, and I was genuinely proud, like… this is it. All that sacrifice was going to pay off.

  Then everything went sideways during KYC for the funded account. My mom was doing the verification, but she had trouble holding the phone steady. I stepped in for literally a second just to help her stabilize the camera—my face and one hand accidentally came into the frame. That’s it. Maven’s automated system flagged it as a “mismatch” and terminated the funded account immediately.

  I told support I wasn’t trying to do anything wrong—I was just helping with the camera during a family verification. But their response felt cold. They called it “fraud” and refused to refund my $13.80 savings.

  The worst part is that I haven’t even started live trading. There’s been zero financial loss on my side, so keeping my money over a technical glitch is just not right. This isn’t “risk management”—it’s taking advantage of a young trader. It’s cruel, honestly.

  UPDATE: I reached out to support (Edward) to explain what happened step-by-step, and he wouldn’t really listen. He said my explanation was a “threat,” and he confirmed they’ll keep the funds. They’re using rigid automated KYC rules over a 5-second camera adjustment to profit while providing no service. That feels heartless.

  UPDATE 2: This is still nothing but an excuse to keep a 17-year-old student’s money. I opened the account in my mother’s name specifically to follow the rules, and she was physically there during the KYC. The only “violation” was my brief appearance in the frame while helping stabilize the phone. If they won’t reinstate the account, then at minimum they should refund the money they took after I didn’t even get access to trade.

  FINAL NOTE: Maven reportedly tried to remove/hide this review, but I’m sharing the facts because the issue isn’t resolved. If you’re a young trader, please be careful—automated KYC mistakes can end your account instantly, and they may not give you any real chance to fix it.

• 

  Ahsan Mahmood

  3 months ago

  They rejected my review saying I had placed too many days before the news during Phase 1. If I did anything wrong, they should have notified me before moving my account into Phase 2. Honestly, it feels like they’re just wasting everyone’s time, and the whole thing seems like a total scam. They should at least be clear about the rules instead of waiting and then acting like it’s my fault.

• 

  Lukas Schneider

  3 months ago

  I received my payout within 2 days, which I was pretty happy about. It probably could’ve been a bit faster, but I ran into a small issue during the KYC process. Still, it was nothing too serious and in the end everything got sorted. Overall, I’d say I had a good experience with them.

• 

  Youssef Boudiaf

  3 months ago

  ———————————————————–
  UPDATE:
  I was looking for the exact definition of “Drawdown – the maximum % decline your account can lose from its starting balance.”
  But honestly, I can’t find anything on the site that clearly mentions “from the starting balance” or “initial balance”.

  Let me be super precise. Your website says something like “4% for 2-step”. What it does NOT clearly say is “4% of the initial account balance” (or “starting balance”), and it also does not explicitly say “4% of account size” the way some of your support answers imply.

  In finance and math, a percentage (%) always needs a clear anchor. Without a fixed reference like “initial balance”, people will logically apply it to current equity (or current value).

  What I’m challenging is the way the rule seems to work in practice. When you enforce a fixed $200 cap on a $5,000 account, you’re not really following a pure percentage rule anymore. You’re effectively switching from a relative % rule to a flat dollar constraint. And yes, this can produce the same result sometimes (for example, 4% of 5,000 equals $200), but the problem is that the “hidden change” becomes visible as the account grows.

  So when you say “4% for 2-step account,” but in real enforcement it acts like “a fixed $200 max risk,” that feels like a transparency breach. It’s not written on your website, and it’s not stated anywhere in your public explanations. The fact that your support refuses to point me to where it says “4% of starting balance” makes me believe the rule is being invented or adjusted behind the scenes.

  I’m not saying it should be impossible to use a fixed cap. I’m saying it must be written clearly and consistently, otherwise profitable traders get set up to fail.

  ———————————————————–
  After I passed the challenge, I received a message saying: “You violated the trading rule in your Challenge Account: ‘All in: Risking more than your drawdown limit.’”
  When I asked what that meant, they told me I risked more than $200. But at the same time, they referenced it as 4%.

  Here’s the confusion. If it’s really 4% (a variable %), then on the second trade after gaining money, the max loss should change.
  For example: if I start with $5,000 and risk is 4%, then 4% of that is $200. But if after the first trade I make $100, equity becomes $5,100, and 4% of that would be $204 (so the allowed risk shouldn’t be stuck at $200).
  In another scenario, if the math were applied using a starting anchor, the limit would remain tied to the initial $5,000, not to the changing equity.

  In my case, they said the limit is $200 for a $5,000 account (which matches 4% of $5,000), but they also described it using “4%” language. Their wording is unclear: the website only says “4% for 2-step account,” not “4% from initial balance,” and not “4% of account size only.”

  Because of this, I’m writing to expose what looks like a serious transparency breach in Maven Trading’s risk parameters. Their FAQ and marketing claim a clear “4% drawdown” rule calculated based on the account type, but their actual enforcement appears to use an undocumented fixed dollar cap (like $200 on a $5,000 account).

  Mathematically, 4% is relative—so it should be based on an explicit reference point. If your system switches to a flat cap, then it should be stated directly in the rules. Nowhere in their official terms does it say “4% of the Initial Balance” or “4% of Account Size only” in the way support implied.

• 

  Rohit Sharma

  3 months ago

  I’ve purchased an account of $2K, and the maximum loss limit was shown as 5%, with a daily loss limit of 3%. I placed my first trade on 1st April, and so far it seems to have hit my SL. I ended up with a loss of around -6.86$. Later, when I opened the Maven dashboard, it shows a much bigger loss of -25.87$, which honestly shocked me.

  What’s more concerning is that this was my first trade, and the loss from that first trade shows -6.68$. Now the maximum loss shown on the dashboard is up to -25.87$. I’m requesting you to please check the calculations and clarify exactly how the loss is being created—because the numbers don’t match what I expected from the 5% max and 3% daily limits.

• 

  Hassan Al-Sayed

  3 months ago

  Absolutely terrible company.

  I’ve been in this space for about 3 years and I’ve worked with several prop firm companies. Honestly, I haven’t come across anything worse than Propfirm. There’s really no real advantage here at all, and I’ve made a full list of the cons.

  1) Execution on their server is noticeably worse than what I’ve seen with other companies. Yes, price slippage can happen naturally, but what they show is way too exaggerated. On my side, the indicators often look perfect, yet the fills are still off in a very frustrating way.

  2) Support is bad and they never answer clearly. I’ve sent plenty of emails and also used their live chat on the site, but the responses are either incomplete or just unclear.

  3) Account challenge and verification issues. I managed to exceed the 3-step account a few times, with an average win rate around 70% across 3 different accounts. My risk settings were always in the range of 0.5% to 1%.

  I finished the challenges and then tried to complete the verification process. They refused to accept the notarization. I submitted pictures of my passport, and they claimed it was a forged document. What makes it even more confusing is that I skipped the verification on other platforms that use Verrif in the same way—there, passports were accepted without problems.

  The support team is also very rude and not cooperative at all. When I ask if they can follow up manually or help me sort it out, the replies are short and not clear. In my experience with funding platforms, support is usually friendly, but here it feels disgusting.

  Honestly, I don’t understand it. If the document is “forged” or “suspicious,” then what exactly are they asking me to provide that would be acceptable? I even completed verification previously through Trustpilot using Verrif, and the very same passport was accepted.

  Anyone thinking about buying accounts should be very careful.

  My Account Number: 10258187

• 

  Arjun Singh

  3 months ago

  The SL didn’t trigger on my open position, and the platform straight-up breached my account.

  My internet connection is perfect—around 200 Mbps—and I had clearly set both TP and SL before placing the trade. After that, the market moved against my plan, so I relied on the stop-loss to close the position. But the SL didn’t trigger at all, and instead my account got breached directly.

  I contacted the support team right away, but they didn’t really respond or solve the issue. The only thing I got was a warning. They basically told me that if I ask again, they’ll ban me.

  I’m also a YouTuber and I live-stream every trade. I have complete proof of what I set and what happened. I just want my account back, because this doesn’t feel like my mistake at all.

• 

  Hassan Raza

  3 months ago

  Completed the trading challenge successfully, so I met the requirement and I wasn’t just guessing. My consistency score was 19% and I followed every trading rule. In total, I earned $236, which I believe was legitimate.

  Then came the KYC part. During live verification, my camera shifted a bit, so the photo quality wasn’t great. Still, I tried to fix it right away and I even offered several options for re-verification:
  – A live video call
  – Submitting fresh documents
  – Notarized verification
  – Using Veriff-style cross-platform proof

  Unfortunately, the outcome was brutal. My account got blocked, withdrawals were denied, and I was accused of an identity mismatch.

  What really upset me is that there was no clear appeal process. They didn’t allow any withdrawal of the funds I earned either. The response was basically: “Decision is final.”

  So yeah, traders should be careful—one small KYC mistake can end up costing you everything you worked for.

  Account ID: 810304

• 

  Hassan Yusuf

  3 months ago

  I’m going to keep this as factual as possible, because the numbers pretty much tell the story.
  I had a Maven Instant Funding account, trading XAUUSD. The issue is that my account was breached when a floating loss went beyond their 1% drawdown rule by $4.31. And to be clear—this wasn’t $43, and it wasn’t $430. It was just $4.31 above the limit on an open position.
  I submitted a formal appeal right after, including my full trade history, timestamps, and annotated screenshots to show the context. Maven reviewed it and then denied the appeal in their final email. That email didn’t really offer any real route to resolution—no goodwill adjustment, no explanation, and no acknowledgment that, on most funded accounts, $4.31 is basically a rounding error. For me, it felt like a closed door from the start.
  What bothers me most is that this wasn’t reckless trading. It wasn’t me ignoring rules I didn’t know about either. This was a small $4.31 floating exceedance, and they used it to wipe the account completely. No grace, no proportionality.
  So if you’re considering Maven, here’s the takeaway: their rules are enforced with zero discretion. A $4.31 overage on an unrealized (floating) loss is enough for them to terminate the account and still keep your subscription fee. To me, that doesn’t feel like a partnership—it feels like a trap.
  I still have the annotated screenshot and their final email saved. I’m happy to share with anyone who asks, or with any platform that investigates these cases. Take your money to a firm that treats traders like people, not like numbers they churn through.

• 

  James Taylor

  3 months ago

  I passed the first step of their 10,000 challenge, then I had to send my KYC information, including my ID and a selfie. After that, every time I replied to their email, it seemed like a different person was replying, and they kept saying my document wasn’t okay. It’s now been 4 days (and honestly it’s starting to feel way longer). I still haven’t received a proper answer, which is frustrating because the process should be straightforward.

• 

  Youssef El Idrissi

  3 months ago

  I’ll be honest, I was a bit hesitant about withdrawing at first, but the whole process went smoothly. The company and their support team did an excellent job handling my payment, and I really can’t complain. Honestly, it surprised me how fast and organized everything was—within about 24 hours, my request was already processed.

  So thank you so much to MAVEN TRADING from the bottom of my heart. If you’re an experienced trader and you want a reliable platform, I highly recommend MAVEN. My sincere thanks to you all.

• 

  Ahsan Malik

  3 months ago

  I had a pretty disappointing experience with Maven Trading.

  I submitted my withdrawal for $162.10—this was actually my FIRST payout—and it got rejected with the reason “KYC Fraud.” The frustrating part is that they didn’t share any real proof or even a clear breakdown of what was wrong.

  A few facts from my side:

  – I used my real identity for KYC.
  – I did not break any rules.
  – My account was fully verified and was allowed to trade.

  If there was genuinely an issue with my KYC, it should’ve been caught during the verification stage, not suddenly at the payout stage.

  Instead of doing a proper review or asking me to re-verify, they just refused the payout and said the decision is final.

  Overall, there was:

  – No transparency.
  – No detailed explanation.
  – No chance to explain my case or defend myself.

  As a trader, you put in time, effort, and discipline to reach payout day. When even a smaller amount like this is denied without proper communication, it really makes you question what happens with bigger withdrawals.

  Honestly, this makes it feel like “KYC Fraud” is being used as a blanket excuse to avoid paying traders.

  I’d strongly recommend other traders to be careful and think twice before choosing this firm.

• 

  Hassan Ali

  3 months ago

  KYC Issue — No Support Response for 4+ Days

  Rating: 1 star

  I completed Maven’s trading challenge with a 19% consistency score, so the platform seemed fine initially. However, during KYC verification, my camera shifted a bit and it triggered a photo error.

  As soon as it happened, I contacted support and honestly I didn’t leave out anything. I:
  – Sent a clear, detailed explanation
  – Suggested multiple verification options
  – Shared all valid documents
  – Even requested live video verification

  The problem is the outcome: there has been ZERO response for 4+ days. I followed up repeatedly, but nothing.

  On top of that, there’s a $240 withdrawal currently pending (it’s around $236 as per my record). Silence from support after that is pretty unacceptable.

  Traders, please be careful: the platform looks good until you actually need to withdraw.

  Update: I’ll update this review only if they respond professionally.

  Account: 810304

• 

  Oliver Hughes

  3 months ago

  I’ve been trading with Maven for more than 18 months now, and in that time I’ve paid over $2,000 in account fees. My results have been steady, and overall I’ve received more than $7,000 in payouts, so I felt pretty confident about the platform.

  Sure, there was one hiccup—one of my payouts got rejected because of the “1-minute rule.” That said, my experience with the support team and the payment processing had been mostly smooth, right up until recently.

  When I tried to purchase a new account, I was hit with a “Contact Support” message. I then got in touch, and I was told that management has decided they no longer want to continue the professional relationship with me. Honestly, that came as a bit of a shock.

  Could you please clarify what specifically led to this decision? Given how long I’ve been with Maven and the fact my track record has been consistent, I’d really like a clearer explanation.

• 

  Sandeep Khadka

  3 months ago

  Bad spread and taking commissions

  I wouldn’t recommend anyone to trade with Maven—especially if you’re trying to complete any kind of challenge. For that, you really need solid execution and a good risk-to-reward setup. But the main problem with this prop firm is the spread: whether you day trade or swing, the spread can basically cut your 4.1 RR down to around 2.1, even when your execution loss is more than ~0.1%. On top of that, they also charge heavy commission along the spread, which makes it even harder to pass the challenge.

  This is my 3rd time trading with Maven, and honestly it’s going to be my last. When I contacted their team about this issue, they ignored my message and didn’t respond at all. So, please—don’t believe in a company with a questionable trading system and poor support like this.

• 

  Ananya Sharma

  3 months ago

  Maven Trading claims to offer the best service and customer support, but my experience has been quite the opposite. I want to warn everyone: the firm took my money and still hasn’t provided my account. Since then, I’ve been following up, and their customer support keeps asking me to wait—now it’s been about 24 hours, and there’s no proper update.

  What’s more disappointing is how rude and inappropriate their representatives have been. I would strongly request the CEO of Maven Trading to look into this and handle the customer support properly, because this kind of delay and behavior isn’t acceptable.

• 

  Arjun Verma

  3 months ago

  I’m still new to this firm, so I haven’t fully judged how things work yet. Right now, I’m learning the process and trying their rules properly—mainly to see how best it works in real practice. Once the payout comes, I’ll share a clearer review of my experience and whether the results match what they claim. For now, early impressions are okay, but I’ll confirm after I see the payment.

• 

  Youssef El Amrani

  3 months ago

  I have not worked with this company before, but I decided to give it a try. From what I’ve seen so far, it looks quite professional, the prices are fairly reasonable, and it also seems to have a solid reputation among traders. I’m going to test it for a bit and then I’ll come back with an update to my review after I have more real results.

• 

  Amit Verma

  3 months ago

  I completed my funded account challenge without much trouble, and now I’m trying to do the KYC. But they’re telling me that I’m doing KYC fraud, and because of that they’re not allowing me to complete the verification.

  Honestly, this doesn’t make any sense. I’m ready to share all my documents for KYC, and I believe they’re handling my case incorrectly. As of now, I still haven’t received my funded account.

  This seems totally fake and like a scam on their part.

• 

  Addie Krajcik

  1 year ago

  The executions are impressive, and I have to say, the support team is fantastic. Honestly, there’s a lot to appreciate about this firm. I got funded, but unfortunately, I didn’t manage to receive a payout. I’m planning to give it another shot with a $2,000 account. Let’s see how that goes!

• 

  Felicita Stoltenberg

  1 year ago

  Trading with Maven has been a fantastic experience. It’s definitely one of my preferred proprietary trading firms for several reasons. First off, the platform is incredibly user-friendly, making it easy for anyone to navigate. I must say, their responsiveness is impressive as well. Additionally, the spreads are remarkable—truly noteworthy! The execution of trades is swift, which I really appreciate. Overall, my experience with Maven has been quite positive.

• 

  Tyrell Howell

  1 year ago

  Initially, this proprietary trading firm seems solid, but I’ve noticed that their fees have increased significantly. The major issue, in my opinion, lies with their spreads, which might be among the least competitive in the prop firm sector. It’s essential to proceed with caution if you decide to go with them. On the brighter side, their customer service is commendable; they are polite and helpful. Ultimately, the decision rests with you.

• 

  Vallie Harber

  1 year ago

  I really appreciate this proprietary trading firm. The trading conditions are quite favorable, and they are definitely beginner-friendly. Plus, the customer service is impressively fast. One aspect I particularly enjoy is the TradingView interface; it’s really well-designed and easy to use.

Cancel reply

12345