CEO
Established
Country
Broker
Platform
Trust Pilot
Payment Methods
Payout Methods
Account Size |
Steps |
Challenge |
Price |
|---|
I’m honestly at a loss for words. They closed my accounts without any real reason, and they kept changing platforms over and over again. On top of that, I never got proper access to my accounts—yet somehow they’re presenting themselves like everything is fine.
I had more than $4,000 in profits in there, and it still didn’t matter. The whole experience felt shady from start to finish, and I’m done with them. Never again.
This company feels like a full-on scam. Support is painfully slow, and when it was time for payout, they changed their story at the very last moment. On the final day of the 21-day cycle, they denied my withdrawal and claimed I used “high-risk trading practices.” That’s simply not true. I stayed below a 2.5% maximum risk per trade and I was well within their margin limits.
What makes it worse is the way they handled the breach. They accused me without showing any real evidence, and after that they blocked me from their Discord for 7 days. So basically I couldn’t even open a ticket or contact support properly.
Honestly, save yourself the trouble and don’t put your money into this.
Honestly, I get why you’re asking for a refund, but the message you sent—“PLs refund pls”—doesn’t really give any context. It reads more like a quick panic note than a formal request, so the seller might not take it seriously or even know what went wrong.
If you want your refund request to work, include at least:
– What you bought (item/order name)
– Order number (if you have it)
– Date of purchase
– The problem (wrong item, missing delivery, charged twice, etc.)
– What outcome you’re asking for (full refund, partial refund, replacement)
If you tell me what happened and where you purchased it, I can rewrite your refund request in a clearer, more convincing way.
I wouldn’t recommend them—at all. From the way things went, they come across as a major scam, and it’s just not worth risking your hard-earned money (or the time you spend dealing with them). If you’re considering giving them your payment, I’d strongly suggest you think twice and look elsewhere. Don’t trust them.
Don’t just skim the good reviews—they’re often just marketing. In my case, Xpertfunding claimed I breached their 1% risk rule. Naturally, I asked for something basic: the exact trade that supposedly caused the violation, along with clear proof.
On Wednesday, they contacted me and asked me to provide my email. They said they would send the details there. I waited, but what I got later wasn’t the evidence I requested. Instead, I received a message stating that, after an “internal review,” the breach was considered “valid.” They still didn’t show me the trade, didn’t share any supporting data, and didn’t really explain what I supposedly did wrong beyond that.
If this is a real rule enforcement, a prop firm should be able to point to the specific trade and show the numbers. Saying “our tech team reviewed it” with zero transparency just doesn’t cut it. Honestly, this has been a painful experience and it leaves me feeling like the process is designed to shut people down rather than provide answers.
My payout was rejected because of an alleged “1% risk rule” breach. I asked for the exact trade details that supposedly proved the violation, since that’s the only way to verify what actually happened.
At first, support seemed willing to help. They even agreed to look into it and requested my email. But then they backtracked and refused to share any evidence or documentation related to the claim.
What I got instead was a vague reply referencing “internal checks,” followed by a final decision with zero transparency. No specific rule explanation. No screenshots, trade records, or calculations—just a conclusion.
If a firm is operating fairly, it should be able to clearly state which rule was violated and show the underlying information that led to the rejection. In my case, the lack of proof and the refusal to provide the relevant trade details are genuinely concerning.
They told me I’d breached the 1% risk rule, and honestly, that would’ve been easier to accept if they’d actually shown what happened. I then asked for the exact trade that violated the rule. On Wednesday, they requested my email and promised the details would be sent there.
What I got later was just a vague message. It said that “after an internal review” the breach was considered “valid,” and that nothing could be done to reverse the decision. Still, there was no trade disclosed, no supporting numbers, and no real evidence at all.
If someone claims you broke a rule, you should receive clear proof—at minimum, the specific trade and the calculations behind the decision. In my case, the whole process was handled with very poor communication and zero accountability.
They said I broke their 1% risk rule, but when I asked for the specific trade that supposedly caused the issue, they never actually provided proof. To make things worse, they requested my email and told me they’d send the details, yet later I was met with a different story—basically that there was nothing they could do to reverse the decision.
Overall, the lack of transparency and communication is a real problem. If you’re dealing with them, take extra care.
Xpert’s local team came through with a live walkthrough all in one session, and honestly it was a smooth experience from start to finish. The community also feels genuinely friendly—people were easy to talk to and not dismissive at all. I’d definitely recommend Xpert to others, especially if you want real, hands-on guidance without the runaround.
Worst prop firm I’ve ever dealt with.
I received **three payouts** from them, and while they were relatively small, I did eventually get the money. Still, there was always some kind of issue with the payout process. But I figured “okay, it’s annoying, yet workable.”
Then things changed on my **fourth attempt**. This time, I finally hit a **bigger payout**—and that’s when they pulled the plug.
Here’s what happened: I had to wait **14 days** after the payout request, which already felt long. After those 14 days passed, I received an email saying my **account was closed**. The reason given was **copytrading**.
The part that really makes no sense is this: I’m not copytrading. I only use my **own trades**. So the claim feels dishonest, especially because the first three payouts went through fine. In those earlier rounds, the payouts were smaller—yet somehow there was “no copytrading problem.” Now that they owed me more, suddenly I’m apparently copytrading.
Honestly, the story doesn’t add up. If it was truly an issue with copytrading, why wasn’t it flagged before? This should tell you everything you need to know.
**Stay away from them.**
This was my first time using Xpert Funding, and honestly, I’m really glad I gave them a shot. The support team is quick to respond, too—whenever I had questions about my funded account, they were on it right away. I also noticed very low slippage, which made the whole trading experience feel smoother.
Overall, I’d say it’s a solid platform. Highly recommend.
I reached out to get my API fixed, and they had it sorted in just a few hours. Honestly, the response time was super quick—like, faster than I expected. Big thanks to Uday for jumping on it right away. He was really helpful, and he’s definitely the best.
⚠️ Quick heads-up: my experience with Xpert Funding
I’m posting this mainly so other traders can make a more informed call before jumping in.
In my case, my funded account was terminated recently for “copy trading.” Here’s the confusing part: I trade manually and I don’t use any mirroring tools, copy platforms, or anything similar. Still, the platform treated my activity as if it was being copied.
After digging around, I noticed the same story popping up in multiple other reviews from different traders. A number of people said their accounts got flagged for mirrored trades, but they weren’t given clear evidence or a proper breakdown of what triggered the decision.
What really bothered me is that support didn’t provide any specific trade examples. They also didn’t point to the “external source” they claim my trades matched. Without that detail, it’s hard to verify what happened—or dispute it—so I’m essentially left without access to the service I paid for.
I can’t say this will happen to everyone. But if you’re considering Xpert Funding, I’d genuinely be cautious. Read the newer reviews first, and don’t rely only on the basics.
Stay safe, and trade smart. ✌️
I actually managed to get through a 100K challenge, get funded, and then reach a profit target on my funded account. However, the whole payout process felt extremely messy and unfair.
Here’s what happened: once I first became eligible, there was no clear countdown or “next payout window” timer on the dashboard. Based on the timing of my first trade, I apparently had a 15-minute window to submit my payout request. I missed it, so I had to wait another two weeks. This time, I did catch the window and submitted the request. Then things stalled—10 days passed with no update, so I contacted support. Their response was basically that payout requests take **14 to 30 days** to review.
So, by the time roughly **six weeks** had gone by after I hit profit, I finally got a decision: my payout was denied. The reason? A rule in their FAQ that was, in my opinion, *very* unclear—something about using a copy trade, which they say is only acceptable for risk management.
Honestly, it wouldn’t surprise me if payouts are routinely denied and only the “successful” stories make it online. Just look at the recent **one-star reviews**. If you’re thinking about buying a challenge with Xpert Funding, you should know this kind of experience could happen to you too. And based on how things are running, I doubt this company will be around much longer.
I had a few quick questions while I was browsing the site. I typed them into the chatroom and, within a minute or two, Collins was already helping me out. Honestly, their support team is really fast—at least in my experience.
Collins also did a great job. He answered every question I had clearly and without any runaround. Overall, it was smooth and easy, and I felt like I was taken care of right away.
Xpertfunding have genuinely impressed me lately. Honestly, they’re up there with the best—maybe even the best—fast-growing prop firms in the industry right now. What really stands out is that they haven’t been around for that long, yet they’ve already built a solid foundation. They’ve put so many systems in place that the whole setup feels more organized than what you usually see from newer firms.
Another big highlight is their customer service. It’s been top notch every time I’ve reached out. They’re quick to respond, and they don’t just give you a generic answer and move on. Instead, they keep helping until you’re fully satisfied, with no unnecessary delays.
On top of that, the price tags on their accounts are refreshingly friendly. Compared to several other prop firms, the cost feels more reasonable and easier to get into—especially if you’re trying to test the waters.
Overall, it really feels like Xpertfunding is here to dominate the prop space, and the systems they’ve built are a big part of why. Big thanks to the team behind the scenes as well—someone is clearly working hard to make Xpertfunding stand out.
This company really does what it says it will. From the start, everything is explained clearly, and the customer support is genuinely helpful—quick to respond and easy to deal with. There are no weird surprises or hidden catches, which makes the whole process feel smooth and trustworthy. Overall, I’d say the experience is very good, and it’s nice to see a business that delivers on its promises.
First off, this is my very first time winning a giveaway account, and honestly, I’m impressed. My account arrived on time, and once I started trading, I noticed something right away: their rules are strict in a good way. They kind of force you to stay disciplined, and that’s exactly what I needed.
Because of that structure, I managed to complete multiple challenges, then upgraded to a live account. On top of that, I was able to make some profits too. I also requested a payout, and everything went through smoothly. The support team deserves a mention as well—every time I asked a question, they replied kindly and fairly quickly.
So why did I rate them 4 stars instead of 5? Mainly because of the payout frequency. They work on a 14-day cycle, which is a long wait for active traders. It would feel much better if they reduced the timeframe and made withdrawals faster. If they improve that, I’d be happy to upgrade my rating.
Still, overall I really like this company. The rules are transparent, the process is clear, and the future looks promising. Thanks, Xpert—future is yours!
I bought an account a few weeks ago, and honestly, everything was running perfectly. Then I ran into an issue, but they handled it fast—like, within no time—and the whole situation was sorted quickly. The customer service was top-notch and super responsive, which made the experience feel really smooth. I’d happily recommend it.
Xpert Funding comes across as a pretty rough prop firm, and not in a “tough love” way. Their rule set feels less like risk management and more like it’s built to slow you down—and in some cases, stop you from getting to your profits at all. Even if you hit a big win in a single day, their so-called “Consistency Rule” can block your payout until you keep trading for additional days (sometimes weeks), which is honestly frustrating.
On top of that, the “max profit per day” limit makes it hard to use any strategy that depends on having a strong, high-return day. Instead of rewarding skill, it nudges traders into a very specific, drawn-out process. The whole thing feels sketchy, like you’re being forced to play by their slow and restrictive system rather than actually benefit from what you earned.
Overall, it doesn’t feel safe or trader-friendly for anyone serious. It’s the kind of setup that makes you wonder whether you’re ever truly going to withdraw—no matter how well you perform.
I wasn’t having much luck with trading at first, honestly. Things felt stuck for me. But once I got the chance to use **XPERFUNDING**, everything started to click. My results improved pretty quickly, and I’ve turned profitable since then.
Now I’m in a position where I can actually cover my rent and even buy a few extra things for myself, which feels like a big deal.
XPertFunding.Pro is a pretty new prop firm, but it’s already been getting a lot of positive chatter from traders over the last few months—basically since early 2025. I’ve been hanging around their Discord community, and the vibe there is genuinely active. They don’t just dump announcements either; the firm regularly shares useful education, runs fun interactive games, and even does giveaways pretty often.
On top of that, the trading parameters across their different products feel reasonable and well thought out. From what I’ve seen, there’s a good balance between challenge and fairness. If you’re curious, it’s definitely worth checking out XPertFunding.Pro—you may even be able to secure an account for free.
Hands down, this is the best prop firm I’ve ever been in contact with. They’re connected with solid platforms, and the whole setup feels well thought out. Honestly, everything runs smoothly—rules are clear, communication is on point, and there’s a level of organization that you just don’t see everywhere. I didn’t have any real complaints, and I’d recommend them to anyone looking for a firm that actually feels legit.
I’ve been with them since day one, and honestly, I couldn’t be happier. The whole team is absolutely professional, and their support is fast—usually you get help in no time.
From my side, everything has run smoothly. The systems work perfectly, without weird glitches or delays, and it’s been really reassuring. Overall, I’m glad I chose them, and I’d recommend them to anyone looking for something reliable.
Top ervaring gehad met Expert. Hun support is echt zoals je het hoopt te krijgen—snel, netjes en super behulpzaam. Ik merk duidelijk dat het hier om echte experts gaat, want ze denken mee en lossen het probleem meteen goed op. Echt een aanrader als je kwaliteit en service belangrijk vindt.
At the moment, I’m wrapping up my evaluation, and I can honestly say I haven’t run into any issues with this prop firm so far. To put that in perspective, I’ve had some frustrations with other, more well-known firms, so this experience has been a breath of fresh air.
One of the standout parts for me is the dashboard. It’s clean, intuitive, and honestly pretty easy to navigate—no weird menus or hunting around for basic info. On top of that, the Discord support has been solid. Whenever I’ve had questions, someone is usually responding fast, and the answers are actually helpful.
Right now, I don’t have any major concerns. I’ll update again once I’m funded, just to confirm everything holds up after the evaluation phase.
Update: The problem was resolved and they got my account back, so I could try again. Unfortunately, I didn’t read the fine print about how many trades you’re allowed to make in a month. Thanks for helping me get things sorted out—and I’ll update my review once I’ve had a chance to use it properly.
My experience with Xpert Funding has been really positive so far. The registration and evaluation stages were simple and didn’t feel overly complicated, and the platform itself is genuinely easy to navigate. I also like that they’re upfront about their rules and payout structure—everything is spelled out clearly, so you can focus on trading rather than guessing how the process works.
On top of that, their support team has been responsive and professional. Whenever I had questions, I got answers quickly, and they even walked me through parts that weren’t immediately clear. In comparison to a few other prop firms I’ve tested, Xpert Funding feels more structured and honestly more “trader-friendly.”
Overall, I’m satisfied with what I’ve experienced so far, and I’d recommend Xpert Funding to anyone who wants a funding firm that’s transparent, organized, and supportive.
I signed up with XpertFunding around March to April 2025, right when they were still in their early stages. I started with a challenge account and traded for roughly a couple of weeks. Honestly, the whole process felt pretty smooth from the get-go, and the platform ran without any major hiccups.
I didn’t make it to payout because I ended up violating the challenge rules, so that part is on me. Still, I’d say the evaluation felt fair overall. The dashboard was easy to navigate, and the execution stayed stable, which is honestly not something you can always count on from a newer firm. When I had a couple questions, the support team was polite and responsive, too.
My time with them was brief, but it did leave a solid impression. I’m rooting for them as they scale and hopefully keep tightening everything even further.
Honestly, I get it, but those “too many negative reviews” can be kind of a trap. If you’re going to skip a product just because the comment section is loud, you might miss out on something that still works really well for plenty of people.
That said, there’s a better way to decide. Instead of tossing it entirely, scan for patterns—like repeated complaints about the same issue, or the same praise showing up over and over. Check what the most common problems actually are, and whether they match what you care about.
If after that you still feel unsure, skipping is totally valid. But if the negativity feels more random than consistent, I’d at least consider trying it or looking for a more balanced review source first.
They reseted my account right after I passed Phase 1, which is honestly pretty frustrating. I’ve tried to figure out what I did wrong, but I still don’t know the reason. It felt like I did everything correctly, so having the progress wiped without any clear explanation really threw me off.
You mentioned you “just completed Phase 1,” but you still haven’t received your certificate. On top of that, you’ve completed the required **3 minimum trading days**.
A couple quick points to keep in mind: most programs don’t issue certification immediately the moment you finish Phase 1. Often, there’s a short review window (sometimes 24–72 hours, or even a bit longer) after you meet all the requirements. Also, certification is usually triggered only once the system confirms both milestones—Phase 1 completion **and** the minimum trading days—so you may be right at that cutoff.
If you want, paste the exact course/program name and where it says you’re “not certificated yet” (email, dashboard message, or confirmation page). That’ll help me suggest what to check next or what message to send to support.
David Savy
De **Downfall** van Stef Keppens is eentje die je bijna niet kan negeren, maar niet op de manier die je verwacht. Ik zeg eerlijk: het voelt alsof het verhaal overal nét te snel vooruit wil, waardoor je als kijker (of lezer) soms even uit de flow valt.
Op sommige momenten is het best sterk gebalanceerd, met scènes die écht blijven hangen, maar daarna gaat het weer wat haperen. Bovendien komt het geheel voor mij over als “net niet af”: je krijgt wel intentie en sfeer, maar de uitwerking blijft wat aan de magere kant.
Kort gezegd: **de vibe is er**, en het idee is interessant, maar de uitvoering is te ongelijk. Dat maakt dat ik het niet meteen zou aanraden als je iets zoekt dat helemaal klopt van begin tot eind.